Thursday, May 31, 2007

Unbelievable?

It's not magic (or magnets), David Blaine. The Spurs are headed to the NBA Finals.

I ran across this ad on a non-sports related website yesterday afternoon.


If I were a conspiracy theorist, I might say that the NBA has been planning on a Spurs-Pistons Finals ever since the Mavericks and Heat were eliminated. But if the fix is in, I don't get it. Isn't this the matchup that no one wanted?

Matt Steinmetz writes:

No doubt, ABC executives and casual basketball fans are dreading what looks to be inevitable: A San Antonio Spurs-Detroit Pistons NBA Finals.

The scouting report on the Spurs says they have a dominant but boring superstar and a methodical and plodding style of play. The report on the Pistons is even worse — a team with no superstars and a defense-first mentality.

Not exactly a Bird-Magic Finals.

Making this potential matchup even tougher to swallow was the excitement that the Phoenix Suns and Warriors created in the playoffs, displaying wide-open, fastbreaking styles that contrasted with just about every other team out there.
Let me be clear -- we here at SpursDynasty always believed that the Spurs would make another title run this year, and redeem themselves for their game seven loss to the Mavericks last year. I, for one, would love to see a Spurs-Pistons rematch, so that the Spurs can finally silence those Pistons fans who thought they were robbed in 2005.

But now that the Cavaliers have tied the Pistons at two games a piece, after barely losing the first two in Detroit, it looks like LeBron James has a legitimate shot at making it to the Finals. It would be an interesting matchup. The Cavaliers beat the Spurs in both of their games this season, and Cavs Coach Mike Brown is one of Coach Popovich's proteges.

Wouldn't the league relish a chance at showcasing King James?

So why is a Spurs-Pistons Final inevitable, so much so that the NBA would feature Tim Duncan and Chauncey Billups in their ads? It's hard for me to believe that this is what David Stern wants. And we know from past experience that Stern gets his way too often.

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Game 4 Recap

In case you missed it, Michael recaps game 4 on PtR, "Manu Ginobili Was the Second Gunman on the Grassy Knoll."

Nice recap and a clever title, Michael. But I think the second gunman was this guy.

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, May 27, 2007

Well, that was predictable

Game 3 San Antonio @ Utah: Jazz 109, Spurs 83 (2-1)

I stare blankly at the imposing box score.

109 points against.

66 in the second half.

25-39 (64%) FGs allowed the last two quarters.

17/19 Assists to turnovers for us, 26/12 for them.

Our bench outscored 38-29.

Five minutes of run for one Beno Udrih.


None of these things make for a pretty picture.

So of course I can't help but come to one obvious conclusion.

Little do the sheeple realize the spider-trap they've tip-toed into. AP Photo/Douglas C. Pizac

GREGG POPOVICH IS A FUCKING MASTERMIND.

I'm dead serious. You knew we weren't going to win this game no matter what. I knew it, you knew it, your momma knew it, and you better recognize that everyone on the court knew the deal. If you honestly expected the Spurs to win that game then A) You're the kind of cheery-eyed "aw-shucks" optimist that plays the lottery and really believes that those pills you ordered the other day will grow your winky to a respectable size, allowing you to finally shower in the gym without embarrassment; and B) You're not very well versed in Spurs history.

We don't sweep people. Not since the Admiral retired, anyway. No matter who we play, no matter how inept they seem when we're kicking their asses, the bad guys will always snag a game or two against us. We're simply not mentally strong or mean enough to rip people's hearts out and do a Mariachi dance around them. We have to make it hard on ourselves. It's not a good thing or a bad thing, it's just who we are. Accept it already.

How To Make a Taunting Sign: This one, I thought was a rather brilliant example of clever sign making. Notice how it seems to subtly that our three stars are not only foolish, but also rather unfortunate-looking. AP Photo/Steve C. Wilson

And no, I don't want to hear about the Grizzles in 2004. Everyone sweeps Memphis. How'd that year work out for us, anyway? Exactly. The fucking Mavs swept Memphis last year. It doesn't count.

Anyway, this team is notorious for playing one "pussy game" every playoff series. Usually they've come in Game 4, on the heels of a close Game 3 loss. It happened that way with both Seattle and Detroit in '05 and Sac-to in '06. A pattern has been established.

Give Pop credit for seeing the signs and thinking outside of the box. Tim was in constant foul trouble and was a pouting, butter-fingered mess when he was out there. Tony's frequent jaunts to the basket were geometrically challenged let's say. And Manu wasn't doing nearly enough of the little things well to justify his 33% shooting on the evening. The less said about Spurs 4-12, the better. The defense was atrocious, the so-called bigs weren't cutting off penetration in the slightest, and loose ball fouls were plentiful. Plain as day, we were playing worse by the minute and there was no way we were gonna pull out of such a nosedive in the lair of the Mormons.

How Not To Make A Taunting Sign: Now this, on the other hand, is just a mess. Note how its author had to shamefully resort to the lowercase "L"s once he realized he was running out of room, thereby ruining what had been an ALL CAPS motif. Also, "Fundamentally Thugs" is both tremendously unfunny and grammatically insensible. If Timmy is known as "The Big Fundamental" then it would make sense to refer to the Spurs as "Fundamental Thugs," no? Does that have bad religious connotations? Just a miserable effort all around. If this were a sign, it'd be Beno Udrih, but without all that shiny potential. AP Photo/Douglas C. Pizac

Going into the fourth, it was a near certainty that we were going to lose. The only question was by how many. So Pop the Wizard did what any of us would do to turn a relatively close game to a boat race, and said "Ahoy matey" to Cap'n Jacque Vaughn, who let's face it, might as well be playing with a peg leg by this point. The rout, as they say, was on.

It's a brilliant tactical move I tell you. By getting our pussy game out of the way early, it gives us an excellent change to compete in Game 4. If Pop tried all out to keep this competitive, when his charges were clearly not emotionally equipped to do so, all he'd have gotten for the trouble was a 12 point loss in Game 3 followed by a drubbing on Monday. Instead, we let the Jazz beat us so convincingly last night that on aggregate they've now outscored us by 9 points after three games. The slate has seemingly been wiped clean, even though they're still at a series deficit. In short, I'll be shocked if we don't play well tomorrow.

When did I know for sure that it wasn't in the cards for us yesterday? It came at the 3:10 mark of the 2nd quarter. Robert Horry baited the refs into calling a foul on Boozer with a flop that was so heinous and unsporting that Raja Bell was blushing. He literally went down untouched. It was flat out a disgusting display and it's the second time this postseason I've been embarrassed by Horry's actions. It's bad enough the guy mails it in every regular season, but having to constantly defend Horry's un-Spur like behavior is becoming very tiresome.

I remember getting a very queasy feeling in the pit of my stomach after a series of replays showed how badly Horry stage-dived for his two free throws, and this was before those two slices of Indian pizza I forced down at halftime. It was definitely a bad omen and wouldn't you know, his two freebies which made it 42-34 would be the last time we'd enjoy an eight point lead in Game 3. In fact, we got hammered 75-41 the rest of the way. Cheaters never prosper.

Recently I've heard Horry make some comments along the lines of him not wanting to retire and wanting to return to the Spurs. To this I say thanks but no thanks. I would be very disappointed in Pop for the reasons stated above, as well as others, if he were to offer Horry a roster spot for next season.

Go away.

Anyway, that's to worry about in the off season. We're still smack dab in the middle of the Western Conference Finals, and as the ol' cliché goes, a series doesn't start 'til the road team wins, I guess that means the last three games have all been a figment of my imagination. I suppose I should be a tad concerned that the Jazz got 109 points with Okur and AK combining for only two, but honestly, I don't have it in me to be concerned at this stage. I think we're the better team, I think we're going to win the series, and until the Jazz win a road game, there really isn't anything for me to mentally or emotionally invest myself into. I still haven't gotten over the absurdity of Utah even being in the WCF and am hopeful that my overconfidence won't come back to bite me.

"Aren't you glad I didn't say banana? Get it? Huh? Cos 'orange' sounds kind of like 'aren't you.' Hello?" AP Photo/Douglas C. Pizac

If you insist on a Game 4 preview, here's a short list of things for the Spurs to work on:

- Timmy has to play the pick and roll better at both ends, especially defensively.
- No more stupid loose ball fouls.
- Quit playing Jacque Vaughn.
- More Duncan on the high post or the wings, less down low waiting and waiting...
- Tony should not be allowed to shoot the ball without somebody passing it to him (and no, the inbounds off a made basket doesn't count).
- Tell Manu to quit waiting for the screener and just go already.
- If our guards aren't going to fight through picks better, the bigs have to play higher off those screens.
- No tinyball.
- Like seriously, quit playing Jacque Vaughn.
- Make Horry earn his minutes and if he doesn't, give Bonner a look
- Ditto Bowen. Maybe we should try a zone at this point.
- Pop should try to play two of the big three together at all times.
- Gotta take Harpring and Giricek seriously on the road.
- Make Tony understand that getting past Williams is often fools gold as their bigs are waiting for him back there.
- At this point I'm begging, please for the love of all that is holy, no more Jacque Vaughn.

(sigh).

3 Stars

3.
Tony Parker - He didn't suck, pretty much the only Spur who could make the claim. But he didn't play nearly as well as his numbers suggest either.
2. Carlos Boozer - 27-12. His chest hair outscored Francisco Elson 6-2.
1. Deron Williams - 31-8, with 5 steals. We are turning him into a superduperstar. Thanks Bruce!

I'm sorry, I really have no choice.

P.S. Baldness, organic chemistry, studying, Seattle, therapy, my life sucks, I know big words, Michael Finley sucks, Spurs are old and slow, Comcast sucks, my DVR didn't record the game, I can't watch it live nobody tell me what happened, I gotta study for my lab, my therapist is weird, James White makes me hard, I hate chatting online, organic chemistry is difficult.

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, May 26, 2007

What Were The Odds?

The NBA is soooooooooooooooooooo shady...

Paul Allen is planning to offload the Portland team after realizing you can't just buy all the free agents to win a title.

Seattle has such citywide apathy for the Sonics' crowing to get a brand new facility that there is literally a citywide vote to NOT subsidize the team, regardless of threats to move the franchise away.

Now, with the Pac NW poised to move a team, and sell the other, BOTH TEAMS MIRACULOUSLY WIN THE LOTTERY! YAY - WHAT WERE THE ODDS???

Portland had a 5.3% chance of getting #1, and Seattle had a low % too... but both won in a behind-the-scenes "lottery."

"The Basketball Gods" - I guess Stern is God to the league.

The NBA is cold shady.

Bookmark and Share

Friday, May 25, 2007

"The Dynasty That Wasn't"

This is sad and bizarre on so many levels, nevermind the article it refers to.


Bill Simmons' wet dream.


{Thanks to Aaron S at For the Love of Sports for this.}

Bookmark and Share

Game 2: Illustrated

http://poundingtherock.com/story/2007/5/25/134755/976

Deadspin mocked us for not posting anything about the game. I've never had my shoddy work ethic questioned before, this is an outrage!

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Dizzy, Nautious, and Dehydrated - All Signs Point to Spurs Fever

Game 1 Utah @ San Antonio: Spurs 108, Jazz 100 (1-0)

Let's see... I don't have to write anymore term papers, sit through lectures, or con my way to a passing grade in español anymore. I got the interminable graduation ceremony out of the way (the highlight, by far, was a speech given by this Asian gentleman; the head of our department or something, dressed like the Pope, whose accent reminded me of that alien general who was giving the rebel pilots strategic advice on how to attack the Death Star) without too much of a hassle. Game 6 was obviously amazing as we all know. I managed to drive my sister to the airport on four hours sleep Saturday morning, write the blog, pack for home, go to a graduation BBQ of a friend, and drive home from 10 pm to 5 am without killing myself.

AND on top of all that, the Spurs easily dispatched the Jazz in Game 1 with Manu once again playing superbly.

About the only thing that didn't make me want to vomit on Saturday. (AP Photo/Eric Gay)

One would think I'd be as happy as one could possibly be right now, right?

One would think.

Unfortunately A) You all clearly don't know me well enough and B) I've been sick as hell since roughly three hours after the BBQ.

Vicious food poisoning, some kind of virus... I'm not sure what. Manolis, who has extensive experience in food prep, has a theory that you really don't want me to share, for multiple reasons. Let's just say I've had no appetite at all since Saturday evening. At least I'm losing weight, right?

So I did watch the Jazz game, but in less than ideal circumstances, so I wasn't able to quite get into it and enjoy it as much as I'd have liked. Oddly, it turns out that I was hardly in the minority there as much of the country tuned the game out and our own fans didn't sell out. Naturally, this has led to a lot of bitching and trolling in the Spurstalk community. Skip Bayless compared our fans to those of the Atlanta Braves.

Ouch.

Me? I'm not saying I'm thrilled with it, but I understand. The whole thing about a four round NBA playoffs is that each round is supposed to be more of a challenge than the last. In '05 we went from the Thuggets to the Superhomophobes to the Run'N'Whine Suns to the Sunshine and Lollipops Gang in Detroit. Each round was progressively harder and more compelling, like a good video game.

Utah is a good team, a worthy 2nd round caliber opponent. But it's just not fair or realistic for your fans to not feel like it's a bit of a comedown after playing the 61 win Suns. As much shit as I've given them the past two weeks for their bitching, moaning, and complete disregard for defense, no one can convince me that Utah is the better team.

Don't blame the fans for this. There are only two groups of people to blame here:

1) The NBA Execs who voted against reseeding the playoffs after every round like they do in football and hockey.

2) The Dallas Mavericks for gagging so embarrassingly to the Warriors. The only reason the Amare suspension was even such a big issue in the first place is that as soon as it was announced, the entire NBA watching community, (and there are more than 19 of us out there, despite what Mr. Simmons might want you to believe) and especially the media that has to go cover the games collectively realized, "Oh my God, we're gonna have a Spurs-Jazz Western Conference Finals!!!"

Some ABC/ESPN TV honchos probably had a coronary. Can you imagine that conversation with Stern over the phone?

TV Guy: "We don't give a FLYING FUCK about integrity, Stern, we didn't pay you all that money so you can give us a month of Spurs-Jazz and then Spurs-Pistons. We DEMAND you order your zebras to give the Suns every call the rest of the series."

Stern:
"Sorry guys, can't help you there. I got too much heat, pardon the pun, for how blatantly incompetent the refs were last year. We're just gonna call 'em the way we see them and the best team is gonna win this year."

TV Guy: "We'll remember this when your TV contract is up, David."

Stern: "And I'll remember how you guys wouldn't shut the fuck up about the Detroit brawl for a solid month, how you showed the Madison Square Garden thing with Carmelo over and over and how every time we have the smallest on-court incident you paint our league as being thug-ridden. I'll remember how much camera time you give Cuban to stir up conspiracy shit, real or imagined. You want our league to be as controversial as possible to make your jobs easier and then criticize all the controversies. You can't have it both ways."

TV Guy: "So you want us to spend the next two months talking about Barry Bonds and Mike Vick? Great, that sounds fun."

Stern: "Oh relax, I'm sure you can get one of your guys to bait T.O. into saying something moronic any day now."

Let's just lay off the fans a bit, huh? God knows if I can afford to pick only one game and I'm in that position, I'd wait until the Finals too. We've beaten the Jazz every home game this century, so forgive people for being over-confident.

What can be said about the game? The Jazz, were doubly unfortunate in that such a lay-off undoubtedly made them a bit rusty and also because their previous opponents, the Warriors, let them get whatever shots they wanted, with minimal resistance. Adjusting so easily from Nelson's "Shoot and let shoot" brand of basketball to Pop's "Um...no...not so much" hoops totalitarianism cannot be easy, and it caught up to Utah in that second quarter. They couldn't throw it into the ocean in the first either, but at least we were helping them out for a bit by throwing it away carelessly. In the second our offense clicked and their defensive effort had Sloan in a foul mood.

I don't think effort and rust were the only things that the Jazz could be blamed for though. It's pretty obvious that our centers weren't exactly a high priority on Utah's defensive game plan. Fab and Elson got good looks all day, combined for 20 points on 9 of 11 shooting, and most surprisingly, didn't commit a single turnover between them. Boozer deserves most of the blame for giving them so much space, but he was probably keeping an eye on Tim the whole time. Also, Sloan gave Fisher 38 minutes, but Millsap just 15. That's just retarded. He can't guard Manu and can easily be guarded by him. He didn't put AK on Manu or use the big russian's size to post up Gino. He didn't have Williams post up Tony. He didn't utilize the pick and roll with Okur or Boozer nearly enough until it was too late. Why is he so afraid to play Millsap and Boozer together? It's not like Giricek or Harpring can even get shots off against us.

Recognize, biyaaaaatch!!! (AP Photo/Eric Gay)

If the Jazz have any shot of shocking the world they'll go super big and play this line-up to death: Okur-Boozer-Millsap-Kirilenko-Williams. Rebound us to death, get our bigs in foul trouble, beat the hell out of everyone, seal off the paint and hope we miss our threes. Bring in Obi-Wan as the sixth man, Fish as the seventh, maybe a few token minutes for Collins or Araujo to bang on Timmy and Dee Brown can get a look when Vaughn is on the floor for us. Put Giricek on ice.

Don't kid yourself, Mr. Chuckles, you weren't blameless in all this. (AP Photo/Matt Slocum)

As for the Spurs, we don't have to change a whole lot honestly, and that's not just me being cocky. Tim has to play the pick-and-pop with Okur a little better because the big Turk had better looks than his 3 of 15 scoreline suggests. Tony has to tighten up those turnovers a bit of course. And we could stand to get some more rebounding from Fin and Bruce, for sure. Beyond that, what else could we have done better, given the circumstances?

I don't buy the argument that we played badly or were disappointing in the second half. We had a big lead, the outcome was never in doubt, (no matter what Pop says) not even for a second, and our guys were physically and mentally exhausted. With 54 second half points of our own, it's not like we weren't doing anything right. The 108-100 score is deceptively close because Manu and Tony missed a few free throws late and the Jazz had that one stretch in there where they hit like ten straight shots.

The postgame moaning was just the latest bit of Pop psychology (yeah, I invented that) that has been going on all playoffs. We're not that good, we're lucky, we did this and this and that poorly and our opponents don't have to change a thing to beat us next game except be luckier. Has any coach in history been less comfortable with a long winning streak or a 25 point win? He knows there's nothing for him to complain about or con the losing coach about.

Whatever. I don't care that Utah's players buy it as long as our guys do. I don't want a repeat of Game 2 vs. the Mavericks from last year. I don't think it will be because first of all, we really had to grind out that first win against them, down to the last possession whereas here we kind of coasted down the stretch and relaxed mentally. Also, Pop saved a couple of his bullets there in that fourth, letting Williams go at Parker instead of Bowen. I really don't think we'll be seeing Tony on him in a close game the rest of the way.

Anyway, today is the contrived lottery, and as a Spurs fan I haven't had to care about this in ten seasons. But I care this year. To clarify, I care about only one aspect of it. I just don't want Boston to win one of the top two spots. Simmons can go shove his gigantic melon up up his ass. Whining about your franchise's misfortune when you have more banners than anybody else... how pathetic is that?

Enjoy the Al Horford Era, ya prick.

Your 3 Stars

3. Manu Ginobili - Still en fuego, mis amigos, with 23 points and a playoff career high ten dimes. Also a game high +17.
2. Deron Williams - Gotta put him here. 34-9-7, even if a lot of the damage came in a lost cause. The kid is just frickin' special. I've pretty much given up arguing that Paul is better than him.
1. Tim Duncan - In the 2nd quarter that put the game away he had 14-4-2 on his way to 27-10-5. Ho-hum.

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, May 19, 2007

Any Questions?

http://poundingtherock.com/story/2007/5/19/18581/0463

(I'm happy, but exhausted.)

Bookmark and Share

Friday, May 18, 2007

If That's What Kissing Your Sister Feels Like, I'm Kidnapping Mine and Moving to Kentucky

Game 5 San Antonio @ Phoenix: Spurs 88, Suns 85 (2-3)

With all due respect to my colleague Matthew, I couldn’t disagree more about how it feels winning this game. At first, when the suspensions were announced, I admit I felt guilty about it. Hell, I even suggested that we should sit Timmy for the game just to protest against the national attack of our team’s integrity and principles. Looking back on it, I feel kinda silly writing that now, but heck, it made Deadspin, so yay me. If the national sports media wants to use one incident to villify our entire franchise; if everyone's memory and perspective about the Spurs are that lacking, then fuck it, I'm through feeling guilty and sympathetic for the Suns.

Fuck them.

In fact, fuck everyone.

It's one thing to be upset with David Stern's ruling, but why take it out on players who had nothing to do with it? KSAT in San Antonio reported that a bomb threat was phoned in at the Spurs hotel Tuesday night and that fans were honking their car horns all night outside the hotel in hopes of disturbing the players' sleep. I mean, really... Then when the game ended TNT's Craig Sager couldn't even conduct his usual postgame interview on the court because some idiots were throwing water bottles at them. You may have noticed that Manu got interviewed inside the tunnel a short while later.

It seems as if the entire sports media - an entity that's supposed to neutral mind you - is actively rooting against us now. Bruce Bowen is being treated like a cross between Bill Laimbeer and O.J. Simpson, despite the fact that he hasn't had any drama the past two games. Everyone's taking shots at Manu for being a flopper (how is that dirty exactly?) and nobody seems to remember that this was the same guy who nearly got his eye gouged out in Game 3. Where was the national outcry over the Suns' dirtyness? Exactly how many times does Oberto have to be manhandled under the basket before someone notices? We've had both Tony and Elson undercut this series, but we're the goons.

The difference in this series hasn't been the actions of the respective teams, it's been their reactions. When bad things happen to us, whether it's a hard foul, drawn blood, or a bad call, we say our piece to the refs but quickly move on. We don't retaliate and we don't complain to the press afterward. The Suns react poorly and complain about EVERYTHING.

Here's three things I don't understand about the Horry incident:

1. How come nobody has said word one about Bell charging into RoHo immediately after? Horry was already walking away from Nash. It didn't become an altercation until Raja charged into him. How come he didn't get in any trouble for instigating things further?

2. How can anyone sit there and tell me that Amare was just a concerned teammate and that he had no bad intent? What a crock of shit! Nash was crumpled on the sidelines and Amare wasn't walking straight toward him at all. He was walking diagonally, ready to make a beeline right into the scrum. The only reason he didn't do anything was because four Suns assitants dragged him back before he could. If he pulled a Kermit Washington on Manu or Tony, then would we still be the dirty team?

3. Finally, if Diaw and Stoudemire were just being "concerned teammates" then what does that make Pat Burke, Jalen Rose, Kiwi, etc...? What does that make our reserves who didn't budge an inch? Were they all just shitty teammates? Was Beno Udrih thinking to himself, "Man, screw Robert Horry. I wouldn't piss on him if he were on fire." Did Marcus Banks just stand there because he's bitter that D'Antoni likes that overrated white boy Nash over him? Are Amare and Diaw the most sensitive, caring teammates on the planet, willingly risking suspension to check on their little buddy? Puh-lease.

Whatever. Everyone wants to talk about the great game the Suns almost won, nobody wants to give us any credit for coming back from 16 down. We were the bad guys for ruining their sports movie. Because it's our fault that their coach played the same four guys to death. If you're never ever ever gonna play bench players, no matter how physically desperate for bodies you are, why even have them on the roster? The Suns literally have six guys who never play. Our coach plays ten guys every night, no matter how much three or four of them suck and...

and...

well I guess I have no point.

No, screw that. I do have a point. No matter how crappy your scrubs are, at least play them in the regular season so that you won't kill your guys before the playoffs even start. And who knows, maybe one or two of them will surprise you. Suns owner Robert Carver (a total assclown of nearly Cubanian proportions) has said that he's not willing to pay three guys superstar money every year if they're not even going to make the Finals, and supposedly this year was their core's last shot to get it done before, I'm guessing, buh-bye to the Matrix. But maybe the Amare suspension will serve as a reprieve from the governor and Carver will think the group was good enough to go all the way, but just got unlucky. Either way, this organization desperately needs a strongwilled GM who can stand up to D'Antoni and demand that either he starts playing a 9.5 man rotation next regular season or he look for a new job.

I think the person I'm annoyed with most of all is Simmons. His column, written before Game 5, was absolute hypocrisy, on so many levels.

1) His "tuck-rule" analogy is a total flip-flop. After it happened he argued that it was a good rule, that it was fairly called, that the Patriots totally deserved to win the game and that anyone complaining about it was a crybaby and a whiner. He even tried to rationalize it, saying if Jon Gruden was less conservative with his play-calling in the 4th quarter, the Raiders would've killed the clock and won the game outright. Now that the Pats have 3 rings (and are favored to win a 4th this year) he's more objective about the whole thing and concedes it's a stupid rule. What a jackass.

2) He doesn't like that Bowen is a chippy, dirty player, but defends the good ol' days when players were allowed to beat the hell out of each other. The reason Bowen is effective is because other players hate to play against him. Tim loves Bruce. Ask Isiah what he thought of Laimbeer and Rodman. Ask Magic what he thought of Rambis. Ask Jordan what he thought of first Oakley, then Cartwright, then Rodman. You need gritty, chippy players to win. Is it any wonder that the Suns have more of an edge now because they have Bell on their roster?

3) Speaking of Bell, I found it ironic that Simmons has focused on Bowen and ignored all the liberties that Bell has taken on Manu and Tony over the course of the series. The only difference is our guys don't complain to the media after games.

4) Has he been watching the series at all? Practically every time Tony's covered Nash, we've gotten the better of the matchup. Whenever Bowen's been on him, Nash has destroyed Bruce. One would think that Nash would be begging for Bowen to cover him all game, especially now that so much has been said about Bruce that the refs are targeting him.

5) Simmons has been on the Suns' nuts all year, saying how much he loves how they play, loves their free-flowing offense, and he conveniently ignores that they're the softest team in the NBA, even with Bell. If this team played in the 90s with the Bulls, the Pistons, and the Knicks, they would have the shit beat out of them and been lucky to win 47 games. When Bird's Celtics were hammering these Suns on the boards by 30, Simmons would've been mocking these guys to no end.

6) I'm getting sick and tired of how much Simmons trashes foreign players. As if American players never tried to exaggerate fouls before 2002. This guy was kissing Manu's butt in '05 and now he slams him at every opportunity. It's gotten to the point that Ginobili could practically have his eye gouged out and people accuse him of flopping. Did Simmons make one mention of the cut under Manu's eye? No. You know why? Because Ginobili doesn't whine like a little girl about the fouls he gets after a game to the press. Even when he's gotten flagrant fouls against him and guys have gotten ejected, like Melo, Manu never said anything bad about anybody. Simmons' rant is both racist and xenophobic. Stop blaming foreigners for everything.

7) Yeah, defenders flop more to draw offensive fouls. So what? Look at all the advantages offensive players have now. They can set moving picks. Defenders can't hand check. The guys can carry the ball on their dribbles like The Professor. Yeah if somebody played like Bell 15 years ago he'd probably get decked. But if somebody dribbled like Tony or AI 15 years ago, they'd commit 30 turnovers a night. Games evolve and rules are interpreted differently over the years. You aren't even allowed to cover receivers in the NFL anymore or pitch inside in baseball. Simmons should fucking grow up.

Really, no broadcaster on the planet should be allowed to bring up the topic of flopping without starting with Raja Bell. The guy is absolutely shameless about it. Did he go three straight possessions last night without falling ass over teakettle on the floor? I know every Spurs fan will immediately think about that play late in the fourth quarter when Manu barely nudged him with an elbow and he hurtled backwards, but that wasn't even Bell's most blatant flop of the night. There was a play in the 2nd quarter I think where he was running back down the floor with Elson, behind the play no less, and Francisco lightly brushes by him. Bell launched himself toward the sidelines like he was stealing 3rd base. I fucking despise him.

8) The goofiest part of Simmons' blog was the part about Bruce being some incredibly coordinated athlete who knows what he's doing at all times. I was reading it, just bewildered. Has he ever SEEN Bruce play? Coordinated? Um dude, there's a reason we hide this guy in the corners on offense. He can't dribble the ball twice before traveling with it or losing it. He's had routine passes bounce off his hands out of bounds at least a dozen times this year. He reguarly shoots air balls on six foot floaters. He might be the least coordinated wingman in the NBA. He has ZERO basketball skill outside of the ability to move laterally on defense. I swear to God if Bruce was half the athlete Bill described him as, he'd average 17 a night.

And if he's so dirty, how come he only gets involved in one or two incidents a year? This guy plays against the opponents best perimeter scorer 82 nights a year plus playoffs. If he was that dirty, wouldn't it come up more often? How come tough guys like Kobe, LeBron and T-Mac never have any issues with him but total bitch-ass crybabies like Allen, Vinsanity and Stevie Franchise do? Is that just a coincedence?

The media are looking for excuses to root for the Suns because we're too boring and unmarketable. Now we're the dirty team. Along with the foreigner team. We don't have any guys where they can run a half-time feature about the different personal meanings of their 59 tattoos. We don't do cutesy dances or hand gestures after made threes. If only one of our stars was a registered sex offender... alas.

What about the game? I watched most of the 2nd half at a party for SDSU's newspaper staff next to a colleague of mine who's a huge Suns fan. He actually told me he'd take Bell over Manu and I don't believe he was totally inibriated when he said it. He said it early in the 3rd quarter, I think Manu only had four or six points at the time, so I knew it'd be a good omen.

I think the team came out soft and intimidated to begin the game. Maybe they were suprised to be booed as a team every possession. Duncan didn't have anything early, Tony and Manu were tentative, and nobody knew what they were doing on offense. The offense was so out of sync that not only were we taking mostly jumpers, but they weren't even open or in rhythm jumpers. Nobody looked like they wanted to play or shoot the ball. Defensively we weren't that poor except against Marion. We couldn't figure out who to guard him with. Seemingly every possession somebody else picked him up (or didn't). Neither Finley, Oberto or Elson could do anything with him for the first 24 minutes and he had 20 first half points on 8-11. As horiffically as we were playing, we started to get something going late in the 2nd with the Manu/Tim pick and roll (Gonzo had 3 of our 4 halftime assists) and I knew that all things considered, 44 points at half wasn't at all an unacceptable amount to allow Phoenix.

The gang regrouped at half, Pop started Manu, did his best D'Antoni impression and hardly played his scrubs, and we started siezing momentum, little by little. We'd make mini-runs, they'd make mini-runs, back and forth. Our offense couldn't put a monster stretch together because once we got Timmy going, they started to double and we couldn't knock down the open shots any better than we could the contested ones.

Finally the dam burst in the fourh quarter and we hit six of our last seven threes to crawl back into it for good. Down 79-71 with a tick over five minutes to go, we smacked 'em with a 13-2 run to turn the game around for good. Fin hit a three, Manu made a hat trick of free throws after Nash hurtled into him on a three point attempt, Tony made a 19 footer from the top of the key, Tim sank two big freebies to tie it back up after the Suns took their final lead of the game, and then Bruce hit the crusher from his usual spot, right in front of the Suns' bench.

How fitting.

The zebras tried to give the Suns one last little bit of help, forcing Timmy to the line when he had already passed the ball to Manu before Bell touched him, but his clanks didn't cost us this time. The Suns had run out of gas. Would it have killed D'Antoni to play Rose, Burke or Banks for a couple minutes, with Phoenix up between 6 and 12 practically the whole second half? We'll never know.

Here is what I do know. All the experts and yahoos who expect the Suns to steamroll us in Game 6 just because Amare and Diaw are back are in for a rude awakening. These games don't get played in a vacuum and the fatigue is cumulative. Nash, Thomas, Marion, Bell, these guys are all exhausted. We can run them out of the building tomorrow if we put our minds to it. Timmy can have his way with Thomas from the opening tip if the Suns don't double. As long as the zebras give us a fair shake, we're going to win this one going away, by 12 to 15 points.

Three tips for Pop...

1) Start Manu. The backup charade has gone on long enough. We're in bigboy territory of the playoffs now and he needs to play major minutes. If we get him going early we'll get the fans into it and if we get the fans into it, the Suns will lose their spirit quickly.

2) Play Brent at backup PG. So far in the playoffs Barry has 24 points at home, 0 on the road. Obviously that stat has negative conotations. But tomorrow we're at home, so let's look at it as glass half-full.

3) Bench Jacque Vaughn. -17 in six minutes? That's unfathomable. How much worse can you or me do? -22? -24? That should be like a reality show next year, "How Much Can a Regular Guy Screw Up an NBA Team in Five Minutes?" Seriously, how badly does he have to play before Pop gets it?

Guys I'd rather see as our backup PG: A) Gonzo B) Bones C) Beaner D) Flight. My graduation ceremony is tomorrow so once again I won't be able to watch the game live, but I'm feeling pretty confident about this one.


3 Stars

3. Shawn Marion
– Monster first half, giving the Suns a big lead, disappeared in second. I’m as shocked as you are.
2. Manu Ginobili – 26 pts, 10 rebounds. His 15 points in the 4th were more than he’d scored in four of the previous five games. Had a couple cringe-inducing turnovers there though…
1. Tim Duncan – Got better as the game went on, was an absolute force of nature on defense late. Forced the Suns to abandon their defensive strategy as poor Kurt Thomas had had enough.

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, May 17, 2007

Worst 36 Minutes All Season

Game recaps are not my forte, and Michael is certainly working on a brilliant recap of game 5 even as I write this. Even so, I’m compelled to write that last night I witnessed the worst 36 minutes of basketball I’ve seen all season. It started in Cleveland and continued in Phoenix.

I have yet to watch a complete Eastern Conference playoff game. I’ve watched highlights and a quarter here and there, but not a complete game. Frankly, I have little interest in the teams -- except for the threat they might pose to the Spurs -- or their style of play. I do like to watch individual players, like Jason Kidd and Vince Carter, but the conference as a whole holds about as much interest for me as do the WNBA or the NHL, which is to say, very little.

What I saw last night was bad beyond belief. The Nets managed to score just 6 points in the fourth quarter. If that weren’t bad enough, they still managed to beat LeBron’s Cavaliers by 11! How is that even possible? The Nets led by 18 at the end of three – a big lead, but not insurmountable. If the Cavs had matched their best quarter of the game (21 pts in the second), they would have only lost by three! But instead they scored just 13, and lost by 11.

Those 12 minutes of basketball defy description. Inept. Pathetic. Ugly. The Spurs-Suns game hadn’t started yet, so I watched the disgusting display with little interest, and waited. Little did I know that the next 24 minutes of basketball would be nearly as bad.

I had mixed feelings going into the game. I thought Horry’s forearm shiver on Nash in game four was uncharacteristic, uncalled for and completely classless, especially coming from a seasoned veteran like Robert.



I watched that game with Bramlet and predicted then that Horry would get suspended, and rightly so.

What neither of us knew then was that Stoudemire and Diaw would also get suspended. Granted, they both left the bench and the rules are the rules, but it just didn’t feel right to have the Suns lose their top scorer for a decisive game five. It wasn’t the way I wanted the Spurs to win.

Then again, I didn’t think we needed to make up for the league enforcing its rules so severely by doing something crazy like benching Duncan either.

As it turned out, it didn’t matter that Duncan was in the lineup, because the team was thoroughly ineffective for the first 24 minutes of play. The Spurs would play their worst quarter all season in the first -- 13 points -- and their worst half after 12 more minutes -- 33 points.

Where was that mental toughness the Spurs are so famous for?

I can’t be sure, but I suspect that Tim, Tony, Manu and even Coach Pop couldn’t shake the feeling that the game had been fixed on their behalf, the outcome predetermined. Of course, I have no way of knowing this.

Maybe they felt like they deserved to win only if they played poorly, or let the Suns lead for most of the game?

That’s exactly what happened. The Suns took a 12-11 lead with 4:55 left in the first and would hold on to that lead for nearly the entire game, until Bruce Bowen dropped a dramatic three point bomb from the corner with just 36 seconds left in the game to give the Spurs a 84-81 lead.


BRUUUUUUUUUUUUUCE!

Until that moment, it was as if the Spurs felt badly playing against a smaller, outmanned Suns. Did they play so badly because they felt like throwing the game, or at least wanted to give the Suns a shot at winning? Maybe.

How else do you explain the Spurs finally leading by three after having trailed nearly the entire game and then Duncan misses both free throws with 24 seconds left?

Never mind that Duncan was fouled by Raja Bell after he passed the ball to Manu Ginobili and shouldn’t have been shooting free throws at all. Duncan was shooting 7 of 9 from the charity stripe up until that point. Was Duncan exhibiting a mental collapse or self-sabotage?

Thankfully, Ginobili and Finley did all the remaining free throw shooting and the Spurs held on to win 88-85.


How do you like them odds, guero?

Manu had this to say after the game:
CRAIG SAGER: You’ve won a couple of rings with the Spurs. Talk a little about the series so far with Phoenix. How would you describe it, particularly tonight’s game?



MANU GINOBILI: Well, it’s about competing. Making it to the Finals is just about that. Playing really hard. Execute your offense, your defense. And play for 48 minutes. That’s what happened in game four. We played great for forty two, probably. And they … after that they came back and we stopped. Today was probably the opposite. They played great for forty two and we came back in the last quarter. So, you can’t relax for a second in this series because you’re done. So we’ve got to learn from that and go to six and do our best game for forty eight.
I’ll leave the three stars to Michael, but my vote would be for Duncan, Marion and Ginobili, in that order.

Here's hoping that the Spurs play their best game for forty eight tomorrow night and close out the Suns.

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Dirk: Worst MVP Ever?

It's official -- Dirk Nowitzki is the 2007 NBA Most Valuable Player. Fans love to argue about what exactly "most valuable" means -- most valuable to the league or to his team? -- but one thing is clear from this year's selection.

Dirk Nowitzki MVP Candy Bar
Soft and Chewy

Dirk Nowitzki turns out to be a controversial MVP both for fans -- many of whom would have preferred the honor go to Kobe Bryant, Steve Nash or LeBron James -- and the sports journalists who voted for him. Many have delivered mea culpeas to their readers since Dallas's ugly exit in the first round of the playoffs.

Steve Kerr realizes that he should have seriously considered Tim Duncan as the MVP.
I have to come clean: Not once this season did I make mention of Tim Duncan for MVP.

I realize I'm not alone -- there weren't many people on the Duncan bandwagon when it came to discussion of the award -- but as the playoffs continue and basketball fans focus on the San Antonio Spurs star on a nightly basis, it seems absurd that he wasn't at least in the MVP picture all season.

After all, Duncan enjoyed one of his best seasons in years, averaging 20 points, 10.6 rebounds and 2.4 blocks per game and shooting 54.6 percent from the field. Following a season in which he struggled with plantar fasciitis in his foot, Duncan regained the bounce in his step and once again has dominated on the block.
Gregg Doyel writes for CBS Sportsline:
We're going to look back on "2007 NBA Most Valuable Player Dirk Nowitzki" and laugh. Hell, some of us were laughing before he even picked up his trophy.

Nowitzki, who wimped out of the playoffs and took Dallas down with him, as MVP of this NBA season is flat out wrong. It's criminal. Felonious.
And Kevin Hench of FOXsports.com ranks Dirk as one of "History's 10 most undeserving MVPs."
I thought Steve Nash should have won this award for the third straight year, but I take no joy in Nowitzki's flameout against the Warriors. After a season in which he scored 24.6 points per game on 50.2 percent shooting from the floor and 41.6 percent shooting from behind the arc, Dirk scored 19.7 a game on 38.3 percent shooting from the floor and 21.1 shooting from deep against Golden State. Anyone want a do-over on their MVP vote?
When accepting the award, Nowitzki did so with mixed emotions.
"Even when I heard I was MVP, I was sad to watch all these playoff games and know that we're not a part of it," Nowitzki said. "It's heartbreaking still to me. I was trying to be positive and be really happy, but it's going to take a while for it to really sink in."
Personally, I've got nothing against Dirk and think he's a great player. Early on this season, David Stern lobbied hard for Nowitzki, maybe hoping to add to the league's growing international popularity. Who knows, maybe picking a Canadian player for the third consecutive year just didn't seem sufficiently international?

Bookmark and Share

Game 4 Recap... grumble.

http://poundingtherock.com/story/2007/5/16/182424/221

Bookmark and Share

Monday, May 14, 2007

The Most Physical Game Ever Played

Game 3 Phoenix @ San Antonio: Spurs 108, Suns 101 (1-2)

Now that’s more like it. That vaguely resembled what I remember Spurs playoff games looking like in ’05. The Big Three was the Big Three again. Brent Barry was doing Brent Barry things again. Bruce Bowen was getting under people’s skins again. The Spurs are turning their opponents into soft, whiny crapweasels again.

Amare had plenty of time to look for signs from the bench. (AP Photo/Eric Gay)

For now, all is right with the world.

It didn’t start out too cheery though. The Suns ran out to an early ten point lead, we fought back to make it close, and they sprinted on another ten point lead. Raja Bell, in addition to being a punk bitch extraordinaire, has apparently added the 3-ball to his résumé as well and he connected on four early ones, thanks to our atrocious close out defense. Boris Diaw, Shawn Marion and Amare Stoudemire (when he was in there) were chipping in their share inside too. The only guy who wasn’t scoring was Nash.

We didn’t allow an obscene point total or anything, the Suns only had 53 at half, but we were giving them a bit too much room, not rotating to the shooters quickly enough, and they were knocking down some shots. The only reason it didn’t look worse was because S.O.F.T. (Sitting Over Foul Trouble) was incapacitated for most of the half and the little Hoser was a bit off.

Stick that up your five hole, you goofy Canuck. (AP Photo/LM Otero)

As for us, we simply couldn’t hit a jumper. Manu, Tony, Fin, Bowen, Horry… clank, brick, thud, ick, and guh. Elson hit like a 16 footer early, and Fab made one from the baseline, but that was it for the first half. We were just missing wide open shots. Consequently, it was left up to Parker and Duncan to keep us in the game for most of the first half. We hit ‘em with a 16-5 run late to go into half with a two point lead, thanks mainly to some Tony heroics inside and a decent stretch of defense. And Finley hitting our first three, after an oh-for-seven start behind the line, didn’t hurt either.

Besides our lousy shooting, the biggest question of the first half was whither Manu Ginobili? It was pretty simple, really – dude’s shot is off. And Pop refused to run any plays for him while Tim and Tony were out there. Basically, he got treated like Brent Barry. Then, our scorers checked out, Fab and Jacque checked in, and – voila! – coach ran a back cut play for Manu, through Oberto. Two possessions later the two of them created another lay-up off a backdoor cut. Amazing! It’s almost as if Ginobili can execute plays that don’t involve him standing behind the three point line. Who’d have thunk it?

The 3rd quarter got pretty chippy. First, Nash got a little too close to Bowen on the wing, when Bruce was clearly not looking to drive or shoot, and lil’ Stevie got a knee to the “inner thigh” (perhaps in the nardular region) and the Suns bench went apoplectic, even though the zebras did blow a foul on the play. Four minutes into the period they had fashioned a four point lead for themselves and lo and behold, the first sub off Pop’s bench was Bones, who had sat the whole game up to that point. Barry immediately hit a deep three, then dished to Bruce for another. We wouldn’t trail for the rest of the game. Bowen hit a 3rd bomb shortly after, right in front of a Suns bench screaming at him, appropriate since no on court defender was anywhere in his vicinity.

Time to up his dosage. (AP Photo/LM Otero)

Still, the Suns crawled back into it. Two Ginobili forays toward the hoop resulted in blocks and fast break points the other way for Phoenix. We had a one point lead when he tried to spin his way into the lane, only to be raked in the eye by Shawn Marion. Gino was crumpled in a heap out of bounds and a foul wasn’t even called. Once he got up, it became quickly apparent that he hadn’t flopped, hoping for a call. His eye was puffy and swelling fast. He had a cut and a bruise right below it and it looked awful.

The Suns made Manu angry. You wouldn’t like him when he’s angry.

Gonzo quickly hit a runner, fooled Bell into fouling him on a three and nailed all those freebies, and then hit a three in his mug. Just like that an 8-0 personal run, with Tim and Tony on the bench no less, and the Spurs had a nine point cushion going into the fourth and the fans were into it.

The Suns have just done what can not be undone. (AP Photo/Eric Gay)

The 4th quarter was mainly The Tim Duncan show (he’s very, very good) and we got a couple of timely bombs from Horry and Fin for good measure as well. The Suns never got closer than six the rest of the way. They scored 29 in the final quarter, but Stoudemire, Marion and Nash combined for 27 of those. We never did let Bell get another shot off and took Barbosa and Diaw out of the game as well. The Suns finished with the same point total that they blew us out with in Game 2, and I suspect they’ll be around that number the rest of the way. We just picked up our offense, which had become far too one dimensional in that second game. We’re not going to beat these guys scoring 81 points.

So what now? After three games, what have we learned?

1. It’s time for an eight man rotation. – Neither Elson or Vaughn are giving the team anything. Let Barry or Manu run backup point. It’s not like the Suns are playing full court, pressuring defense. Taking Vaughn out of the rotation would be a way to get Bones more run without squeezing Manu or Finley’s minutes.

2. Elson has been a complete disaster in these playoffs. He had three turnovers in eight minutes and wasn’t providing much resistance in his own end either. We should just start Horry at this point, give Fab more minutes, and maybe give Bonner a look for six or eight minutes. Maybe he can hit a couple bombs if nobody pays attention to him.

3. Alright, alright, tinyball worked. We were +20 playing small in Game 3. But 15 of those 20 were with Duncan, and that’s a pretty big key. I guess if there’s one team it can work against, it’s the Suns, since they don’t rebound. And Stoudemire was on the bench for most of it. Just don’t run it against the Jazz or the Pistons, ok?

4. Let Tony guard Nash. TP and Manu did a good job of shutting down Nash in the first half. In the second half Bowen had him most of the way and he started scoring again. Plus Marion went off against Finley. Let’s just play it straight here. Not only is Bruce struggling on Nash, but he might be suspended for Game 4 thanks to that knee.

5. It’s okay to run plays for Manu. If he can score when we run actual plays for him when he’s the only guy out there and the Suns know it’s coming, then he can score with Tim and Tony out there. Don’t just use him as a stand still shooter when he’s on the court with him. Run wing pick and rolls with Timmy, run the curls, run the backdoor cuts. These plays have worked all season and they’ll work now.

I’m not sure how the Suns will play Tim this game. I think they might have seen enough of him abusing Kurt Thomas over and over again. And despite the added intention, both Manu and Tony had an easier time getting to the cup at home than in Phoenix. Maybe they’ll switch it up and put Bell on Tony and Marion on Manu. All the more reason for us to run combination plays, move the ball, and get that defense scrambling and switching.

I think we’re okay here. They WILL NOT hit nine threes on us again. I expect that to be the core of our defensive focus between games 3 and 4. As long as we take care of the ball and give ourselves a chance to score every possession (only 3 turnovers in the second half, none in the fourth) and rebound the ball, I think we send this to Phoenix 3-1. We’ve gotten Ginobili going and survived a game where they made more bombs than we did. I expect we’ll get a lot of good looks in this one with more of an emphasis by the Suns in closing off the lane and helping out on Tim.

Timmy can blink Kurt Thomas out of existance with a mere thought. (AP Photo/Eric Gay)

3 Stars

3. Tony Parker
– Locked down first Nash and then Barbosa in his own end and blended in well with the flow of the game. He was aggressive when we needed him to score and moved to the background when Manu and the three point shooters had it going in the second half.

2. Manu Ginobili – Had three steals and was responsible for two other turnovers in his own end and ran the pick-and-roll well on offense. Slowly, but surely, Pop will give him more responsibility as these games go on. If he gets his 3 point shot going, this series is fucking over.

1. Tim Duncan – He’s a monster right now. This is like ’03 Duncan. Absolutely unstoppable. He’s making the MVP voters look sillier by the day.

[Postscript: They just announced Bowen won't be suspended. Phew.]

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, May 12, 2007

Game 2 recap, Game 3 preview.

http://poundingtherock.com/story/2007/5/12/19950/4433

Read on about my personal agony! Yay!

Bookmark and Share

Friday, May 11, 2007

"The NBA's Hairdos and don'ts"

Here's what's been on my mind this morning: Will it take the Spurs five or six games to dispatch the Suns? Will the Warriors hold court at home and take the Jazz to seven games? Will the Pistons lose even a single game before making it to the NBA Finals?

And then I came across this bit in today's San Francisco Chronicle:
Commenting on a basketball team's hairstyle is the type of thing that your passive- aggressive sports-hating spouse does to get you back for hogging the television during "Grey's Anatomy." (Sound familiar, Funk?) But once -- and just this once -- she/he may be onto something. Along with free throws, rebounding and team defense, this NBA playoff series may come down to hair.

Whether you're applying for a new job, going out on a big date or about to play your first home game in a best-of-seven series, nothing boosts a man's confidence like a great new haircut. Is it a coincidence that Golden State had way better hair than the boringly coiffed Dallas Mavericks -- starting with coach Don Nelson's galaxy-shaped spiral of gray hair and including the Heat Miser-inspired locks of Andris Biedrins, which make the Warriors' center appear as if he's about to spontaneously combust?
I doubt you'll find this kind of writing in any other major city newspaper. I'm not sure if this is a good thing.

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, May 08, 2007

Toughening the Suns Up, One Bloody Nose at a Time

Game 1 San Antonio @ Phoenix: Spurs 111, Suns 106 (0-1)

Well, that went about the way one would expect. We had, by far, our best offensive game of the playoffs and probably our worst defensive game. Tony sliced ‘em up for 32 points and Tim had 33 against the pansy division that is the Suns’ interior defense. I don’t want to make it sound like it was a boring game, because obviously with that score line that wasn’t the case, it’s just that… well, NOTHING happened the whole time that was surprising – outside of Nash’s busted nose, that is.

Imagine what he'd look like if he played defense. (AP Photo/Matt York)

I’ve heard and read in a few quarters that it was a very fortunate break for us that Nash had to miss about :50 of game action there at the end, and on the surface missing a two-time MVP is a big deal, but let’s calm down a bit here, okay? The dude was a -12 for the game, compared to Barbosa’s +4, even more impressive for the latter and damning for the former, considering how much of their playing time overlapped. We fully deserved our win. We shot a higher percentage, we made more threes, we outrebounded them by 14, and at no point in the second half did it look like we weren’t in control.

To get back to that 2005 theme that we had with the Nuggets, people have to remember that just because we dusted the Suns in five games in the WCF two years ago; it wasn’t like we blew them out or anything. We won the three games at Phoenix by a combined 16 points. We trailed at half time of two of those three games and trailed at the end of three quarters in two of the three as well (oddly enough, not the same two). Our team just has a habit of enforcing its will, especially in the fourth quarters, and mainly due to Tim Duncan, and the Suns just cannot come up with an answer.

Lather, rinse, repeat. (AP Photo/Jason Babyak)

Not to say that whiny D’Antoni won’t give it the ‘ol college try anyway. I fear that the +/- splits were so drastic after Game 1 that even he could not ignore the mountain of evidence against his smallball gimmickry.

Wanna read something shocking? When the Suns played "big" with Shawn Marion as the SF, they were a +11. Meaning -15 when he was PF.

Think about that.

I don't think it matters all that much if it's KThomas is in there as the starting center or it’s Diaw, as long as it's one of them and they put Amare at PF and Marion at SF. It might hurt their offense a bit, but they would guard us a lot better and rebound better when they're big.

To me, the Suns problem is their insistence on playing Raja Bell, with all his "Manu-stopper" nonsense. Marion was already the best guy they had to guard Manu. With Bell on the floor there is really no one for Marion to guard, at least not commiserate to his skill level. To put it simply, he's too good/talented to waste on the likes of Oberto/Elson/Horry/Bowen and not nearly physically equipped to handle Tim or Tony. Manu and Finley are the only guys it makes sense for him to guard, and unless Pop does D'Antoni a favor and goes small, we're not going to play Manu and Finley together an awful lot.

The Suns should play a Diaw/Thomas-Stoudemire-Marion-Barbosa-Nash line-up as much as possible if they want to beat us. Use Diaw as your 6th man to rest Thomas and I would even go so far as putting him at SF for those four, five minutes a game that Marion sits. Make Bell the 7th man and use him to spell Barbosa or Nash, with LB sliding over to point.

Don't ever play James Jones, ever and don’t use Bell as the SF, ever.

If I’m coaching Phoenix, the defensive match-ups would be simple. When Elson or Oberto is in the game, I’d have Kurt Thomas in there and guarding Timmy and Amare guarding the center. When Horry is in there I’d bring in Diaw to match him and have Stoudemire try his hand at The Big Fundamental, with plenty of help.

I’d put Marion on Manu/Finley and Bell on Parker if I felt compelled to still play Bell a lot, but more likely I’d sit him and go with Barbosa.

Fortunately for us, I don’t think D’Antoni’s about to go to the drastic step of cutting Bell’s minutes from 44 to 20 in one game, the dip will probably be more gradual, and I think it will be too late for the Suns before he figures it out.

If Yosemite Sam ever coached an NBA team... "I say, I say, I say, that there call was horseshit! " (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

Anyway, fear not friends, because I’ve already thought about the proper counter-adjustment for the Suns big line-up. And no, it’s not going small to force them to go small (that would be an ironic twist though).

After just one game – a game we came out victorious no less – I admit to flip-flopping my position on wanting Bruce Bowen guarding Nash. Not only did Bruce do a fairly crappy job of it in the opener, allowing Nash lay-up after Nash lay-up, (I understand we’re trying to turn the hoser into a scorer, but I was thinking the points would be a little harder to come by – say 14 foot turnaround fadeaways) but as long as Bowen’s on the floor Nash gets to rest on defense.

Screw that. I say we cut down Bowen’s minutes, play Manu and Fin together as much as we can, make Nash guard somebody, take advantage of him there and drain him physically as much as we can and force the Suns to play Bell and Marion together. My reasoning is simple:

A) I think we can beat the Suns even if they play big.
B) I think we can beat the Suns even if they play a Nash-Barbosa backcourt.
C) But I don’t think we can beat them if they do A&B together.

So the more we play Fin and Manu, the more we can avoid the potentially radioactive light bulb flicking on in D’Antoni’s head.

The Suns are really making that commitment to improve on defense. Their guys are actually inside the three point line now. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

Besides, if they’re going to make a commitment to be better defensively, then we have to do whatever we must to be better offensively. And that means Mr. Potatohead riding some pine.

All that being said; from our perspective, I think we should stay big; but perhaps play Bowen less. If we play Manu and Finley together, then we make Nash have to guard somebody and drain him defensively. I don't think Bowen did that good of a job on Nash anyway and we can still neutralize Marion on offense just by getting back in transition and taking away his threes. Also, playing Manu and Finley together will force the Suns to play both Bell and Marion, which means they can't stay big AND play a Barbosa-Nash backcourt, which I think is the worst match-up nightmare for us. Plus, I think Phoenix will figure out that that Bell should be the one to guard Tony with Marion on Manu within the next game or so, and playing Fin and Manu together would nudge them away from that idea too.

Of course, after writing all this strategic gobbley-gook I realize that it will take almost a perfect game for us to win tonight because the Commish will remind the zebras that it’s in the league’s best interest to have the best remaining playoff series not be a sweep. I hope I am wrong but I’m expecting the lion’s share of the calls to go the Suns way tonight and would not at all be surprised to see Timmy out of the game early with foul trouble. Maybe a certain big-nosed Argentine can make up some of the slack.

The game's not official until someone pops Manu in the head. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

Your 3 Stars

3. Steve Nash
– Yeah, yeah, -12, I know, I’m a hypocrite. What can I say; he’s still the guy who makes it all go. For the record, I still think we would’ve won the game even if he never went down.
2. Tony Parker – I’ve never seen his jumper be better. He can score at will against these guys if it’s falling. The defense and the floor game (6 TOs, guh!) could’ve been better.
1. Tim Duncan – What? Amare couldn’t guard him? I’m shocked. Shocked, I tell you.

PS: Jacque Vaughn couldn't have been any worse in Game 1, it's not possible. He singlehandedly tried to keep the Suns in the game in his ten minutes on the floor. Four turnovers!?! That's ridiculous. If he does that again we might have to use Manu or Brent as the backup PG.

Bookmark and Share

Monday, May 07, 2007

Heard Tonight

Some things heard tonight on TNT's Inside the NBA after the Jazz-Warriors game.
“I can’t wait for that game (tomorrow night). That Suns-Spurs is a heavyweight slug fest.”
--Charles Barkley, cell phone spokesman and Oakland-hater

“Yes, it certainly is. Well said, Charles.”
--Ernie Johnson, Emmy-award winner

“That’s the key for us, you know, me or Manu or Fin, you know. We’re going to have great opportunities to score because they don’t have a very good defense and we need to take advantage of that.”
--Tony Parker, future Mr. Eva Longoria

“I hate to say this, and I hope it sounds the right way. I think we [the Suns] have more talent than they do. I think that we’re individually better. Collectively, they’re better right now.”
--Mike D’Antoni, Phoenix Suns coach

“San Antonio … the reason I picked them to win a championship, I think … to beat them four times in seven is going to be hard.”
--Charles Barkley

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, May 06, 2007

Bramlet's Giblets: May 6th, 2007

On the Demise of Nutjob Terry, Sour Kraut, that rich fucker who voted for Bush, et al:

This was supposed to provide me with spiritual redemption for last year’s soul-searing loss to the ’Ricks—or at least enough satisfying memories to get me through an eternity in a lake of fire. This was supposed to be even more orgasmic than my weekend-long ménage à trois with Gong Li and Cate Blanchett (in full Galadriel regalia, of course) in Hong Kong.


Please stop calling me, ladies. I’m a married man now.
But we’ll always have Hong Kong.
Instead, I'm left with mixed feelings about the humilating six-game defeat the 67-win, top-seeded ’Ricks suffered at the hands of the eighth-seeded Warriors. What could possibly cause me anything less than overwhelming joy, you ask, at the sight of the Mavericks ignominiously slinking, like the whipped bitches they are, back to the visitors’ locker room in Oakland after a premature playoff death? In response, I give you

The Top Ten Reasons Why the ’Ricks’ Elimination by the Warriors
Kind of (Ever So Slightly) Sucks

1. The Spurs won’t have a chance to personally exact righteous vengeance (this year, at least) upon said bitches. The only way I’ve been able to get to sleep every night for the past year is by having my wife tell me bedtime stories about how the 2007 Spurs mercilessly ground the ’Ricks into the hardwood floor of the AT&T Center on their way to another championship. I suppose that tactic will still work, but now the ’Ricks-grinding part will never come true.

2. As far as I know, Mark Cuban still hasn’t killed himself. I was calling bookies after Game 1 to put money down on that shit. But it’s not losing the money that I’m sad about. I repeat my plea, Mark: make the world a better place by removing yourself from it. A classic example of addition by subtraction.


Do it, do it, do it!


3. The ’Ricks’ suffering wasn’t documented nearly enough by camera-wielding schadenfreudians. There should have been a crew assigned to each player, and two crews for Cuban. Hell, they could make an entire season of a reality show out of that. I’d watch religiously.

4. No matter how much one wants to hate Sour Kraut, one is faced with the fact that he seems like a decent guy. An embarrassingly soft decent guy by professional athlete standards, yes, but decent nonetheless. Any “celebrity” who hangs out with fans and allows himself to be photographed while supremely pissed (in the British sense) can’t be all that bad.


This is always worth posting one more time.

5. The Warriors caught me off guard, so the balloons, confetti, Chinese liquor, Amsterdam hookers, Cuban cigars, and Cuban effigy I ordered on Amazon to celebrate the ’Ricks’ elimination are still en route.

6. Jason Terry can always console himself with Jesus as an escape from the crushing pain of his reality. What a copout!

7. Hating such pitiful losers is a lot less satisfying than hating a fearsome opponent. How could someone hate George Dubya, for example? Oh, yeah, because his incompetence has completely fucked us all.

8. I like the only ’Ricks fan I know (because I generally don’t associate with losers) too much to act out the thousands of taunting fantasies I’ve had since last May. And most ’Ricks fans are such tools anyway that even if I could find anyone else in the Bay Area who would admit to being one, the taunting wouldn’t have its intended effect. It would be like insulting an orangutan’s mother: no matter how true it is that she picks ass-lice and eats regurgitated plantains, it would fall on deaf ears.

I’ll say it anyway: your mothers pick ass-lice and eat regurgitated plantains.

9. Some small, stupid part of me is humbly reminded of similar Spurs playoff disappointments of a bygone era and feels a twinge of sympathy. Whatever region of my brain feels that twinge is quickly lobotomized by the scalpel of good sense, of course, but it nonetheless renders my joy slightly more maculate. Or whatever the best antonym for immaculate is.

10. I have a soft spot in my heart for exercise bikes.



On the Spurs’ Victory Over the Denver Thugettes:

I don’t have a lot to add to the hundreds of thousands of words floating through the blogosphere on this subject. The Spurs did what they were supposed to, and they proved the foolish doubters wrong yet again. The Thugettes got physical with them, and for the thousandth time they showed that that shit will only win the occasional game against them, never a playoff series. I’ll give the Thugettes this much: from what I saw of their reaction to their elimination, they showed a lot more class than their coach, their fans, or the Denver media have generally shown. As much as I initially wanted to dismiss Carmelo Anthony as a punk when he first came into the league, I think he’s actually trying to learn and get more mature (despite that “chickenshit open-court shove,” I’ve seen several positive signs from this guy), and he’ll have a hell of an NBA career...at least as a scorer. If you want my advice on how to maximize your success, ’Melo, it’s simple: avoid the Spurs in the playoffs.


On the Spurs-Suns Series:

The 2007 Suns are better than the Suns team the Spurs dispatched with relative ease in 2005, but I think the Spurs will still be able to impose their will on them for the most part. TD is healthy and playing like the best player in the league again this year, TP is playing better than ever, Findog is hot, Bruce (or Finley or Manu) should still be able to keep Shawn Marion from having his usual impact, and our current big men match up better with quick and athletic teams. And you know Manu is geared up for some big games, especially after ending the Nuggets series on the bench. Spurs in six.


On the other hand, if a large number of people download and properly utilize SpursDynasty's Official 2007 Suns Voodoo Pack, we might just sweep these unfortunate bastards.

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, May 05, 2007

Spurs Game 5 recap/ Suns preview

http://poundingtherock.com/story/2007/5/5/204510/8788

Gratuitious shots at Karl, Melo, and whoever else I could think of.

Bookmark and Share

Spurs-Suns Preview:
"A series the whole world wants to see"

The San Antonio Spurs march to their fourth NBA Title continues tomorrow against the Phoenix Suns. Here's what the press is saying about the matchup.

* * *
Did Bill Ingram make a Freudian slip by writing that "two years ago [the Spurs] won their fourth championship of the Tim Duncan era?" Maybe. He thinks the series will come down to the veterans.
The absolute determining factor for the Spurs will be the contributions of their aging playoff veterans. Tim Duncan, Manu Ginobili, and Tony Parker can run with any team in the league and are arguably the best trio in the NBA. What about Michael Finley and Robert Horry? These are the guys who will be the difference-makers for San Antonio.

The big three will give the Suns’ defense all they can handle, but the key to winning for the Spurs will be Finley and Horry. If the aging veterans can turn in a few more clutch performances the Spurs should be able to take the Suns. If Horry and Finley struggle to hit open shots it could be a long series for Gregg Popovich and company.
* * *
Tracy Graven writes, "Whoever wins this series, wins the NBA Championship." Uh, that's really going out on a limb. But I wouldn't rule out the Pistons in the East -- they won't go down without a fight.

* * *
What's this about Eva Longoria implementing a "no sex" policy while her fiance Tony Parker and the Spurs are in the playoffs? Hey, whatever works.

* * *
Phonenix columnist Mike Tulumello writes that the Spurs definitely have history on their side.
For the now top-seeded Suns, the door to a title has seldom been open wider. Too bad for them the NBA doesn’t re-seed playoff matchups, round by round.

So they must find a way to beat the now-No. 2 San Antonio Spurs, the team that’s been the most difficult for them in recent years; the Spurs have won 17 of the past 21 games, counting the regular season and playoffs, dating back to the spring of 2003.
* * *
Jason M. Williams argues that despite the changes made this season, the playoff formula still isn't working. Under his proposal the Spurs would face the Rockets/Jazz and the Suns would face the Warriors.
There is a simple solution to this problem: copy the playoff format of the NHL. Yes, the National Hockey League. The NHL reseeds each team following each round, which allows the top seed to continually match up with the lowest seeded team remaining in the bracket.

The NBA is the only one of the Big Four professional sports leagues (NBA, NFL, MLB, NHL) that does not serve up the lowest seed to the top seed in each round.
* * *
Here are what the players and coaches are saying:
"I think it’s a Finals-type matchup, but there’s still a lot of teams left to play, and a lot of the teams left can create a lot of problems for everyone."
--Phoenix guard Steve Nash

"This team might be tougher than Dallas, and I’ve thought that all along."
--Phoenix guard Raja Bell

We feel optimistic. We know that we can beat them."
--San Antonio guard Manu Ginobili

"We’ve got to get over 100 points. That’s going to be a big benchmark. If we score up in the 100s seven times, or how many times the series goes, we’ve got a heck of a chance of winning."
--Phoenix coach Mike D’Antoni

"I think you just have to be smart when you run, because we have Timmy and Timmy is going to do a lot of damage inside. I think we can run with them a little bit. We just have to do it smart.

"I think we can play both ways, like in ’05. When we had to play halfcourt, we played halfcourt. When we had to play fast, we played fast."

--San Antonio guard Tony Parker

"It’s the two best teams in the West. It’s going to be a series the whole world wants to see."
--Suns center Amare Stoudemire

Bookmark and Share

Friday, May 04, 2007

World's Tallest Man Weds

This post has nothing to do with the San Antonio Spurs or NBA basketball, but I have a good reason for publishing it. Believe it or not, we get about 100 visitors to our site each month who are looking for information on the world's tallest man. So without any further adieu, here he is, Bao Xishun.
After a global search for a suitable bride, herdsman Bao Xishun ended up marrying a saleswoman from his home city of Chifeng in northern China.

Mr Bao, who stands at 2.36m (7ft 8.95in) tall, tied the knot with Xia Shujian, 29, several days ago.

The 54-year-old gained fame last year when he saved two dolphins by pulling dangerous plastic from their stomachs.

He used his long arms to remove shards that the animals had swallowed at an aquarium in Fushun, north-east China.
Even more surprising than the fact that he married someone 25 years younger than him is that he's just three inches taller than Yao Ming. I don't buy it. Either the Houston Rockets or the Guinness Book isn't being honest. I wonder, can this guy can shoot a basketball?

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

Just another ho-hum laugher

Game 4 San Antonio @ Denver: Spurs 96, Nuggets 89 (3-1)

Just another Picasso for your San Antonio Spurs. God does this team make everything tense. It is tempting to think that the Nuggets couldn’t have possibly given us this much of a battle in 2005, but then you look at the box scores and see that we only won Game 3 by 8 and game 4 went to overtime. So it’s never easy. It only feels like the game you’re playing that day is the hardest game ever to win. Somehow we found a way.

Actually, there is no somehow to it. I’ve been a Spurs fan for 17 years and have come to understand what constitutes winning team basketball pretty well over the years. While fans of other teams might have seen a 50-42 scoreline at half time and been screaming at their televisions and clacking away on their message boards about the need for offense and “let’s get some guys who can make a shot in there” and the like, that wasn’t my line of thinking at all.

The 42 points didn’t bother me at all. We were missing wide open shots. I knew the offense would come. I was pissed about the defense and rebounding. We allowed some ridiculous number like 34 points in the paint in the first half and were at one time being outrebounded by 14. Timmy was playing soft and Elson was his usual clueless self. Horry was having an uncharacteristically hard time making his proper rotations and Finley was flat out atrocious against Anthony. It wasn’t a question of “how are we down eight?” as much as it was “how are we down just eight?”

In the second half however, we got our shit together and held Denver to just 39 points on 15 of 37 shooting (41%). Basically we let AI be AI and shoot the Nuggets out of the game. There are no mysteries about either team after four games and I can assure you, we have no answers for Carmelo one-on-one. Bruce can’t handle him, Manu can’t, and Finley has no chance. We haven’t quite reached Amare Stoudemire in 2005 territory with ‘Melo yet, but he’s awfully close. Without a double team he’s damn near automatic.

Thankfully, Anthony committed four offensive fouls, so he was on the floor just 38 minutes today instead of his usual 45, but even more importantly, Iverson’s insistence on asserting himself as the alpha dog helped us hold Anthony down in the fourth. He played right into our hands, as we all figured he would, and the Nugs scored just 16 points in the final stanza.

Afterward, Iverson predictably insisted that the shots he missed weren’t difficult, saying, “I wasn't in my game. I had so many good looks and so many easy baskets that I missed, it just was frustrating tonight and it's something I have to work through. If I knew how to adjust to it, I would.”

Is that the biggest “no shit” quote of all time or what? He knows no other way to play and it’s extremely doubtful that at 31 years old he’ll ever learn. For a career 42% shooter, there is no such thing as an easy two point jumper. Defenses will give you anything you want over 15 feet all day Allen. Just don’t get to the line and don’t pass it to Carmelo or Nené. It’s all you baby. God, if I could roll my eyes any higher I’d be staring at my own useless brain.

You the Man! (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)

It should surprise nobody that classy George Karl danced all over J.R. Smith’s grave today during his media session. “He's done,” Karl told The Denver Post, meaning he doesn’t intend to play Smith anymore this series. Taking issue with Smith’s poor three point try late in the game Karl added, “And then, of course the one with eight seconds to go, from 50 feet," Karl said. "I just love the dignity of the game being insulted right in front of me.”

Apparently throwing one of your own players under the bus after a close loss isn’t an affront to the dignity of the game. It looks like Karl is gunning for Avery Johnson’s title as the biggest dickhead coach in the Association.

And this was before his coach railroaded him. (AP Photo/Jack Dempsey)

The funny thing is, that as badly as Smith has played, Eduardo Najera, their other bench guy, has been just as worse. Sure he hustles and gets offensive boards, and his defense on Timmy is respectable, but the man simply isn’t a threat to score. All we do when he’s in the game is double off him and make life a living hell for ‘Melo. It’s not exactly a coincidence that we go on nice little runs practically every time Najera is in the game. It’s kind of like the hidden little secret to the whole series – anytime the Nuggets aren’t playing with Camby-Nené-Anthony-Iverson-Blake/Kleiza quintet, they get outscored, and at a fairly shocking rate.

And unfortunately for them, they’ve reached a no-win situation at this point. The heavy minutes are starting to take their toll on their guys and the fatigue that wasn’t showing in the fourth quarter of Game 1 has reared its ugly head by Game 4. They play their crappy players, they lose early. They play their good players, they’ll lose late. C’est la vie.

Ironically, we didn’t even play well offensively. Barry bricked three wide open threes, Fin was a disaster and Manu can’t smell the basket against these guys. Karl’s main point of emphasis in the defensive game plan is to not let Gino get to the cup, at all costs. Consequently, we’re getting the kind of 3 point looks that would get Mike D’Antoni noticeably erect. We managed to cobble together 96 points thanks to eight threes (in 25 attempts) and just enough lay-ups from Tim and Tony.

It's somewhat easier to get to the rim when Mr. Kleiza is prominently involved. (AP Photo/Jack Dempsey)

Speaking of The Wee Rapping Frenchman, let me just say now, after watching Iverson for four games, I have even more fondness for Parker than I did before. I know I get on the guy at times, but I’ve reached the “there but for the grace of God…” level of frustration with The Answer, who I was a huge fan of until he became a Nugget. At least our guy plays defense. When you get down to it, that’s why our team contends every year and most teams don’t. Our big three aren’t any better offensively than the stars of most other decent teams. But our guys play both ends. If you want to play just half the game then you should go join the NFL.

Iverson (and ‘Melo, to a lesser extent) uses defense an opportunity to rest, like a modern Pete Maravich. Instead of playing 45 minutes a night for 47 feet, he’d be a much better player giving his team 37 minutes of effort at 94 feet. Tony didn’t have the greatest day scoring the ball, but he was all over Iverson in the fourth and his defense was a bigger factor for us than some lucky three by Big Shot Bob.

Glory hog. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)

The other key was Manu. Even though he didn’t shoot well, his fingerprints were all over the game. He finished with 18 points, 5 rebounds, 6 assists and 5 steals and seemed to always be around the ball. He had by far his best defensive game, giving up two scores the whole night and even managed to hold his own against Iverson a few times, successfully forcing him to go left and take awkward fadeaways. Once he figured out that there was no way he could get to the rim, he lobbed three straight passes to Timmy for easy lay-ins in one sequence. His biggest shot was a three to give the Spurs their first second half lead at 74-73, the big 7-0 spurt coming ironically from a smallball lineup with Oberto as the only big.

Yes, Horry hit another huge shot, perhaps saving Manu from another killer late game turnover in the process, but we won this one with defense, and don’t let one highlight obscure your memory of an entire game. Up 3-1 now and coming home for game 5, I’m smelling a 2005ish aroma very much indeed.

Your next coach of the Dallas Mavericks. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)

Your 3 Stars

3. Marcus Camby – 10 points, 17 rebounds, 3 assists, 4 blocks. He did all he could.
2. Manu Ginobili – Game by game total of his points, rebounds, assists, steals and blocks:
Game 1: 18 Game 2: 25 Game 3: 32 Game 4: 34.
1. Tim Duncan – 22-11-6, shook off a poor first half and dominated the second as we’ve all grown to expect. The real MVP.

Bookmark and Share