Saturday, May 31, 2008

At Least There Wasn't A Plane Crash

What the fuck is wrong with my diseased brain?

Anyway, here's the last Spurs post of the season. It's uh... long. Shocking, I know. Thanks for everything guys and I hope, time permitting, you all make it out to the bar to watch some soccer with me. I promise I won't judge any of you for drinking gallons of awful tasting beer at 9 a.m. Well, not judge you out loud anyway.

Don't be strangers, k?

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, May 29, 2008

We Still Believe

"Down 3-1, we know it’s really hard to come back. But we’re going to try. Of course, we still believe in ourselves. We’re going to have a shot. As always the next game is THE game."
--Manu Ginobili

A lot of Spurs fans have given up on the chances of the Spurs winning tonight in Los Angeles, let alone winning three straight against the Lakers. Blogger Matthew Powell has thrown in the towel over at PtR, and frankly, I don't blame him. He writes, "This has been a long season for me, for you, for the Spurs. It's not over. But it's time to say goodbye."

Matthew, it's not time to say goodbye. Not yet. Even if the Spurs lose tonight, and I don't think that they will, it won't be time to say goodbye. Not yet.

I know it's unlikely that the Spurs will win the next three games, but it's not impossible. It can be done.

We still believe.

Bookmark and Share

Unorganized and All Over the Place, Like the Spurs Final Play in Game 4

Western Conference Finals Game 4 vs. Los Angeles: Lakers 93, Spurs 91 (3-1)

I'm angry.

I'm angry that the NBA gave this bullshit apology about the no-call the day after the game. Our coaches and players already said it wasn't a foul. Why couldn't we just move on? I'm angry that some of our fans think we were robbed and justified in winning a game we had absolutely no business being competitive in. I'm angry that there's this "they're out to get us" mentality out there by some idiots we got every call in that game for the first 47:57. I'm angry about the way so-called Spurs fans are treating Manu Ginobili. I'm angry I have to pretend to be some stupid over-caffeinated cretin on the radio in an hour, sound and fury signifying nothing, so I can be some gimmicky villain for a LA sportstalk show. I'm angry that this is the way the media world works.

I'm angry that I have to be angry.

Was it a foul? Yeah, probably, I guess.

I don't care. We didn't deserve it. It shouldn't have been our ball in the first place. It shouldn't have been a close game in the first place. How do we fuck up a sideline out of bounds play so badly that Brent Barry winds up with the ball, with Derek Fisher all over him, some 35 feet from the hoop. We couldn't get it any closer? Really?

We didn't deserve to win a game when two of the guys our coach had on the floor for that fateful play - Fin and RoHo - have been our two worst shooters all season long and had been our two worst players in that game. You know who wasn't on the floor for the last play? Tony Freakin' Parker, only one of our three best players. Coach Pop, ladies and gentlemen.

The team lost for a multitude of reasons. The defense was okay, but the rebounding, especially in the first half, was piss poor. Nobody could hit an outside shot, no matter how open. Finley went a jaw dropping -18 in just over eight minutes of floor time. You or me or Brantley or Jake or Dan or Rene or Matthew or Wayne or Manolis could've played instead and not fared much worse. Finley's older than almost everyone I just named. No one played worth a damn really, outside of Tim, Tony, Brent and Bruce.

And yes, we lost because of Manu.

Again, he didn't have it. No energy, no ability to drive, no stubbornness or selfishness or churlishness that stars need to have at times this time of year. He's just not that guy, the asshole star that demands the ball regardless of how he's playing or who's hot on his team.

I'm not defending Manu's play. I'm not.

But the guy took eight shots all game. Kobe takes that many in a quarter. Manu has never been a volume scorer. He's always been an efficient scorer. Remember Game 2 of the '05 Finals vs. the Pistons? Dude took eight shots in that one too. Had 27 points though.

The more shots you take in a game, the more 2-for-8 stretches mean nothing. How many times this season do you suppose Kobe missed six of eight shots? 50? 60? Maybe sometimes two separate times in one game. The more shots you take, the more your percentages even out to their normal levels. Kobe needed 29 shots the other night to get 28 points. Manu need eight to get seven. Everyone is praising Bryant for his game, everyone is bashing Manu for his. Is one really all that different than the other?

The Spurs missed 45 shots as a team. Tim missed over a third of those, 16. Tony missed 20% with nine. Manu missed 13% with six. I'm just sayin'.

I think Gino's biggest problem, aside from his health and his confidence, is that ever since he came into the NBA, Pop has always used him as a problem solver, not a scorer. Get out there Manu, we need some hustle. Some energy. Steals. Rebounds. Passing. Scoring, but only with the second unit really. Pop never has (and I doubt he ever will) told Manu, "We need you to take [x number of] shots tonight."

Manu has this problem solver, x-factor mentality. So when he sees that he himself is the problem, that his shot is off, that his legs aren't there, he solves the problem by not shooting. He looks to pass or, other times, just kind of retreats into a shell and floats along, going five possessions at a time perhaps without touching the ball.

He's hard on himself, unreasonably so. You might see him ignore an open teammate if he has it going, sometimes, but a cold Manu Ginobili just doesn't force shots. He does not. It is virtually impossible to convince him that a contested shot for him, even when he's off, is a higher percentage play than an open shot for a teammate, even if that teammate is Horry or Vaughn or Finley. Manu has more faith in those guys sometimes than they have in themselves, and certainly more than he has in himself.

Does not compute.

____________________

I ruined everything on Tuesday. The day started off well enough, I think I wrote a pretty good post after Game 3. But after that everything just disintegrated, I can't explain why. First I did the radio show and for the first time the producer guy and the host sincerely disliked me, said I was "boring" and "too nice." I was being just honest for saying I didn't dislike the Lakes all that much. I was trying to set up this big Shaq joke I thought of, but they never really played along, so I couldn't get to it. So the show sucked and I was in a funk and I'm in this spiritual dilemma about playing the asshole.

I remember reading this article in Sports Illustrated like fifteen years ago. It was about this goon on the Washington Capitals of the NHL. He apparently blew up at his coach on the bench because the coach told him to go into the game and get in a fight. He refused to do it.

See, hockey enforcers or "goons" know what their role is. They know why they're on the team. They know what is implied when a coach taps them on the shoulder and tells them to take a shift. But it's the biggest taboo in hockey for a coach to tell a guy to fight. It means you think of him as a goon and not as a hockey player. You just don't do it. This coach broke the rule and it just ruined this player psychologically and he flipped out.

I'm kind of going through that right now. I know I'm an asshole. I've been called an asshole my whole life and it comes very naturally to me. But to be told to act like an asshole? When I don't feel like being one? I feel like I'm dying inside. Is this what I have to do to have a career in this business?

Anyway, like I said, I was in a funk. I forgot to shave before playing basketball, even though I shaved before Game 3 and we won. I forgot to bring the shirt I wore during Game 3, this one that had the front page of the San Antonio Express News on it the day after the Spurs beat Utah in Game 5 last year to advance to the Finals.

I played mostly crappy basketball for three hours that night and missed the first half of Game 1.

Honestly I'm more depressed than angry. But the radio people don't want depressed and they certainly don't want resignation.

I'm depressed more than anything about how Manu is being slung through the mud on Spurstalk. There is no lifetime immunity there. There isn't. I said it before and I'll say it again, the Spurs have a lot of awful fans.

I remember watching the Boston Red Sox in the World Series in 2004. All these happy, delirious people yelling and screaming and holding signs that read, "Now I can die in peace."

A few months later, next season these very same people were booing Kevin Millar and Keith Foulke and Mark Bellhorn. Calling them bums and demanding their trades. These guys were playoff heroes who helped end 86 years of futility and already they were forgotten. It depressed the hell out of me at the time and I can't ever quite look at the Red Sox the same way now, and definitely not their fans, who as far as I'm concerned are no different than Yankees fans.

I want to think that Spurs fans are different, but I don't believe they are. Tim and Manu should have lifetime immunity, even if they were to miss every shot they took the rest of their careers. Tony should be right on the precipice of that status.

But looking on Spurstalk.com, it seems I am in the minority for feeling this way. Tim and Manu deserve better fans. I want to think that most of the regulars at SpursDynasty and PtR are with me on this one. I want to think they believe in the concept of lifetime immunity and the big picture. I want to think that for some guys, there's more to our opinions of them than how they played their last game. I want to think we're bigger, better than that. Let me know that we are.

Please.

Postscript:

As you can tell, I'm having a crisis of faith. Not in the Spurs as much as everything surrounding them. The media, the coaching, the fans, all of it. I just finished my radio spot and I didn't give in. I didn't give them what they wanted. I think the producer could tell in the pre-interview I wasn't going to, so they didn't go there with the non-call.

But still, I had some pluck. And I told them I think the Spurs would win tonight. I told them the series isn't over and that we've lost two games by four points and it could very easily be 3-1 the other way. I was still their villain, but not their jester.

I have faith that the guys could pull off a miracle. I think Manu can still string three good performances together, as can Tim and Tony and Bruce. I think they could catch the Lakers overconfident tonight. I think the Spurs won't go quietly into the cold night.

Here's my point though: It won't change my feelings about the principals either way. After all they've accomplished, if this one game affects your opinions, perceptions and thoughts about our big three or Bruce or Pop or Brent more than .01%, well then you're a clod and the worst kind of fan and I don't really want to know you.

This post was just a rambling mess. It has two beginnings, no real ending, and no discernible middle. Obviously, I'm submitting my application to fill Bill Simmons' slot at ESPN.com. My mind is all over the place and again, the Spurs could be playing their last game of the season, their third elimination game already these playoffs. Getting to a fourth would be a godsend.

But with these guys, it wouldn't be a surprise.

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

The Call That Wasn't

Brent Barry's days in the NBA are numbered, as they are for all players, of course. But Barry is 36 years old and his career will be over soon -- maybe next week, maybe next year. Years from now, if anyone remembers last night's game, it will not be for Barry's heroic efforts on offense, scoring a career playoff high 23 points, but instead for Derek Fisher's foul on Barry that was not called by Joey Crawford.



Derek Fisher already has a place in Spurs lore as the Lakers villain who made an improbable shot in an improbable time span in 2005. Joey Crawford is the embodiment of fans antipathy towards the Spurs, a veteran referee who was suspended for the remainder of the regular season and playoffs last year after making a bogus call against the greatest power forward who has ever played the game. Crawford was back to his old anti-Spurs ways in the Spurs-Hornets series this season, even going so far as to poke Gregg Popovich's chest twice to make a point during a heated exchange. Last night, Crawford was the referee who should have made the call, but did not.

Johhny Ludden writes:
Derek Fisher, Kobe Bryant and Gregg Popovich all agreed that Fisher didn’t foul Brent Barry. They’re also all wrong. Fisher landed on Barry’s shoulder, and that was revealing for more than one reason.

Joey Crawford naturally played a role in this story, too. When Fisher went up and Barry stayed down, the one ref staring directly at the play was the same ref who didn’t work last year’s playoffs because he ejected Tim Duncan for laughing. This time Crawford stayed silent, and this time the Spurs weren’t laughing. At least one Spur privately saw this as yet another chapter in the NBA’s Crawford Conspiracy.
Ludden argues that the Spurs didn't deserve to win last night's game, but he's wrong about that. Ludden also argues that the coaches and players who believe that Barry wasn't fouled by Fisher, or that Crawford was right for not making the call, are mistaken. He's right on that point.
“If I was the official,” Popovich said, “I wouldn’t have called that a foul.”

Said Barry: “That shouldn’t be called in the Western Conference finals.”

Barry’s wrong. Crawford should have called it.
Fans agree. Check out the poll on Yahoo. With over 23,000 votes cast so far, 63% believe that Derek Fisher fouled Brent Barry. The only question is whether it was on the floor (45%) or with continuation (18%).

The NBA settled that question today by acknowledging its mistake. The foul should have been called on the floor.
The league office on Wednesday reviewed the final play of the San Antonio Spurs' 93-91 home loss to the Los Angeles Lakers in Game 4 of the Western Conference finals and acknowledged that a two-shot foul should have been called on Derek Fisher for impeding Brent Barry.
Can you remember the last time that the league actually admitted an officiating mistake, especially a game-changer like this one? I can't.

It's unfortunate that Brent Barry's performance last night came in the Spurs first playoff loss at home since May 14, 2007. You may recall, that game was memorable, too, but less for the outcome than for a foul.

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Magic Numbers

We love numbers at SpursDynasty.com and we tend toward the superstitious side, so its no coincidence that our conversations often revolve around numbers.

What numbers will matter most tonight?

4: points that the oddsmakers favor the Spurs by tonight. That's pretty much a draw in my book, since home teams are usually favored by three or four as the default. In other words, the sports books expect a close game tonight and so do betters.

7: consecutive games won by the Spurs at home in the 2008 playoffs.

9: the margin by which the Spurs exceeded the Lakers in assists last game, 22-13. In game one, the Spurs lost the assists battle 16-18, and in game two played to a 20-20 draw. A better passing Spurs team beats the Lakers tonight.

13: consecutive games won by the Spurs at home going back to the 2007 playoffs.

22: points scored by Lamar Odom and Pau Gasol combined in game three. They combined for 27 and 30 in the first two games, both Lakers wins. If the Spurs can keep the Lakers big men off track, they'll even the series at two tonight.

24.5: points averaged by Kobe in games one and two. He scored 30 in game three and the Lakers lost, ie more points for Kobe doesn't necessarily bode well for the Lakers.

30: points scored by Manu Ginobili in game three. I listened to the Steve Mason show today and Steve and his Lakers fans seem to think that they'll win if Manu doesn't have another big game tonight. It would help if Manu scored 30, but its not absolutely necessary. The Spurs were up by 20 midway into the third quarter of game one and Manu had just 5. He finished that game with just 10 and the Spurs still only lost by 4.

36, 37: the ages of Brent Barry and Robert Horry, respectively. Barry had a big impact coming off the bench Sunday night, even though he had just 6 points and 4 assists. The Spurs were +11 when Barry and Horry were on the court. We'll need more of the same out of them both tonight.

Bookmark and Share

Incidentally, I thought Tony Played Very Well...

We win Game 3! So of course I rant. I destroy everything that I love. Such is my relationship with the world.

Bookmark and Share

Harvey: Lakers Lack Muscle

Last Friday before game two in Los Angeles, I wrote that the Lakers are the team that should really be nervous. Now its the Spurs turn, down 1-2, going into tonight's game four.

But there is plenty of anxiety to go around for both teams. Buck Harvey writes ("Lakers lack of muscle only historic"):
Manu Ginobili can’t be any better than he was Sunday. Kobe Bryant can be. And the Spurs should be very, very nervous tonight.

Game 4 will be tight and telling.

But there’s something about the Lakers that isn’t right, even with their 2-1 series lead, even with reason to believe they can fix what went wrong Sunday.

They lack the physical toughness that plays well in June, and they’ve shown that even while taking a lead on the Spurs. Duncan is averaging 18 rebounds a game.

This is why the Lakers should also be very, very nervous. Do they want to face this Duncan in a Game 7?

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, May 25, 2008

Hey Look, It's Jack Nicholson!

Game 2 recap and last Friday's Steve Mason show. Blarg.

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, May 24, 2008

"I blame myself"

"I blame myself for these two losses. It should be 1-1. My mind is not fatigued. I need to step up. It will be different in Game 3."
--Manu Ginobili



"I think being out of gas had somewhat of an effect, but not as much as the good play of the Lakers. We definitely have to have more people playing better to get this done. We thought our last game was our best shot to get something here and just dig down and do it after the seven games (against the Hornets)."
--Gregg Popovich

"We’re confident we’re a very good home team, but you hate to put yourself in a position where you’re down 0-2. One of two things is going to happen -- either we’re going to turn it around and make this thing into a series or we’re not. We are going to go home and try and change the tide of it."
--Tim Duncan

Bookmark and Share

Friday, May 23, 2008

Lakers Should Be Nervous

During TNT's "Inside the NBA," at the end of game one between the Spurs and Lakers, Reggie Miller was ready to call the series.
"This is very reminiscent of when the Spurs beat the Suns in game one in the first round series. Emotionally it took everything out of Phoenix and they could not regroup in that series. I don't think the Spurs can regroup, being up 20 points in the second half, and come back to win the series."

"In playoff basketball, you can't afford to give away games. This is a game that the Spurs should have won."
Frankly, it was a disappointing loss, but the Spurs were not favored to win. They were just coming off an emotional, exhausting seven-game series against the Hornets, had spent Monday night on their broken down charter plane, and were playing a well-rested Lakers team at home. And yet, they were leading 65-45 with just six minutes left in the third quarter. The game was tied 85-85 with 41 seconds left. They almost stole one at Staples.

As Michael has already mentioned, the Spurs didn't need to win game one and they don't need to win game two tonight. They have four chances to win in LA, and they've used up just one. Wednesday night was just one game, like tonight is just one game.
Tim Duncan was leaning against the wall of a conference room in his hotel, fielding media questions, when someone asked him if Game 1 had created “doubt.”

He rolled his eyes. “It was ONE game,” he said.
Despite the fact that Reggie Miller is ready to write off the defending champs, the Lakers are the team that should really be nervous, for three simple reasons:

1. The Spurs have slept three nights in a bed, as opposed to on an aircraft.
2. Pop will make adjustments. He always does. Expect the Spurs to be more aggressive, more physical tonight. Expect more minutes for Oberto and Horry. Expect the Spurs to widen their advantage on the boards. Expect Kobe to play better, but Gasol, Radmanovic and Vujacic to play worse.
3. The Lakers didn't win game one as much as the Spurs lost it. And the Spurs know what they need to do tonight.
The Spurs shot 3-for-21 and committed five turnovers while being outscored 24-13 in the fourth quarter.

“We’re very pleased overall with what we did defensively,” Popovich said. “Our problem was we have to keep scoring, and we didn’t last night.”

“Poor decision-making,” Duncan said. “We turned the ball over, got shots late in the clock, things we can clean up.”
Tim Duncan and the Spurs have got some cleaning up to do tonight. It's going to be a great game.

Bookmark and Share

Lakers Voodoo Ritual

Long time readers of SpursDynasty know that Bramlet Abercrombie is a big believer in voodoo. In keeping with his ritual of bringing down the wrath of the vodun on the opponent, Bramlet has supplied us this downloadable PDF.


Click here to download

What you do with this is, of course, up to you, but Bramlet recommends that you:
  • Cast Pop-Pops (or some variant such as "Party Snaps" or "Snap Dragons") upon the photos. This is most effective if done while muttering obscenities about the players' ancestors. If you do this properly, the players should be covered with gunpowder residue by the time you're finished.
  • Burn the photos. The best way to do this is to hold the flame under each player to create an expanding circle of black ash where his face used to be, until the paper catches fire. There's something vicious enough about this method that one has the feeling that the player senses a disturbance in the force from afar.
  • Toss the remains of the photos into the toilet as they burn, and flush them down. This way of adding insult to injury is the ultimate indignity for a bling-sporting NBA stud.

Bookmark and Share

Poll: Who will win the Eastern Conference Finals?

Celtics or Pistons? How many games?
Pistons in 5
Pistons in 6
Pistons in 7
Celtics in 7
Celtics in 6
Celtics in 5
Who cares, it's the Eastern Conference
See Results

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Well That Just Happened

I know this will come off immature, but all in all yesterday might have been one of the 50 worst days of my life. Probably 30 of those involve sports, in one way or another.

The whole day was filled with bad omens. I was scheduled to do this radio interview with some LA Times Lakers blog, I think, and it was supposed to be like 20 minutes long and start at 11:15 a.m. my time. But because I procrastinated and got distracted and took too long to finish a soccer article for the newspaper I work for, I couldn't leave my place until like 11. Right before I left I checked my phone's battery and it had two out of three bars. I contemplated taking my charger along, just in case, and decided it wouldn't be necessary.

The plan all along would be to do the interview at a parking lot of the Chili's in San Bruno so I could watch the Champions League final between Manchester United and Chelsea afterward before rushing through the usual Wednesday drudgery of collecting police blotters around the peninsula. But because I was late I was driving around some low reception areas and I had a hell of a time getting connected to those guys. I think I hung up on them accidentally once.

When I finally got through, we did chat, and for a long time, but the whole conversation just didn't feel right. I mean, I know it was only my third radio spot, so it's not like I've had a lot of experience to know what I'm talking about, but the thing just didn't have any flow at all. We kept interrupting each other, talking over each other, and at other times there was just dead air. A couple of my jokes landed with a sickening thud. I think a part of the problem was that the guys probably weren't radio pros like Steve Mason is - they were writers first, like me - but obviously a huge share of the blame falls on me as well. When my segment was over they couldn't say good bye to me fast enough and I highly doubt they'll have me back.

When that spot ended I noticed a persistent beeping on my phone, and wouldn't you know it, it's out of juice. It was way too far to go back home and get my charger but I needed to do something, as I had another interview scheduled for 2:25 (with Mason). So I went to the nearby mall and blew $32 on another charger. By the time I got to Chili's, the soccer game was 20 minutes in.

The game was going decent enough, both sides had some chances, but I just couldn't get into it. I was too bummed about how the radio thing went and at the money I wasted. I felt a little better when Chelsea tied it up right before half (I love Manu, I despise Man U). Both teams squandered some chances in the second half and when overtime started I realized there was a good chance I'd miss the ending of the game if it went to penalty kicks. My second spot was scheduled for 2:25 p.m.

Wouldn't you know it, penalty kicks came. I don't know why but for some god forsaken morbid reason the team I root for never wins penalty kicks. I think my lifetime record is something like 2-57 or something. Probably because I root for Team England against everyone but Turkey and the U.S. Obviously when that Portuguese ponce Ronaldo (the A-Rod of international soccer) missed his kick, I was elated. I hate that guy. When the phone rang the fourth round of kicks had ended and it was 4-3 Chelsea. All they had to do was make their last one or Man U had to miss theirs and Chelsea would win.

But I left the restaurant and did the interview.

It went okay, but not great. I didn't feel that I had near the chemistry with the guys as I did before. The last time I was on the producer said I was great, made smalltalk with me and was very enthusiastic about having me back. This time he just mumbled "Thanks" and hung up. My friend Jeremy said I came off as arrogant. Wonderful. I suck at radio.

Anyway, I went back inside to Chili's to see what I missed, and of course I see Man U celebrating. Apparently John Terry, the Chelsea captain, missed his kick, Man U made theirs, and two rounds later some French guy had his kick saved and that was that. Right about then I was officially worried about the Spurs game.

No matter how well the Spurs were playing, no matter how big their lead was, I kept waiting for the other shoe to drop. A large part of it was Kobe. He was so passive and willing to give the ball up in the first half, it didn't feel like he was even in the game. It's not like we were shutting him down, he was shutting himself down. A bigger reason I was concerned though was Manu. He was playing terribly. In the 1st quarter Vladimir Rodmanovic, of all people, had scored on him repeatedly, to the point of the Lakers running plays for him and isolating him and everything. Offensively it wasn't going any better. Manu still couldn't get to the rim, he looked stuck in quicksand, and his vertical looked about as impressive as mine. Worse still, he had some bandage on the tip of his middle shooting finger and it was probably affecting his jumper. At least that's what I was telling myself.

The Spurs were still winning though, and at times, winning big. Tim was magnificent and thoroughly running roughshod over Gasol, as I figured he would if Phil Jackson foolishly single covered him. That theory about "length" bothering Duncan more than size is so much bunk. Nothing bothers Timmy except inconsistency. Dealing with different defenses, different guys, different refs, that's what causes him problems. A foul in Game 3 isn't a foul in Game 5. A foul in the 2nd quarter isn't a foul in the 4th. That drives Duncan crazy. I don't care if Bill Russell in his prime guards him, if it's single coverage and the refereeing is consistent, Timmy will figure him out before long.

Tony was also playing amazingly well. He had 12 points and five dimes at the half, he was running the offense smoothly, and like I expected, Fisher couldn't do anything at the other end if Parker stayed at home on him. Bruce was doing a good job of not giving Kobe anything easy and other guys like Fab and Ime were chipping in, playing very solidly. By the middle of the third quarter we were up 20, 65-45, and the game looked all but over. The series was going to be on our racket, all we'd have to do was win the three home games. I couldn't believe it was going to be this easy, even with Manu playing like crap.

It all changed when Bruce picked up his 3rd foul, with 5:40 to go in the 3rd. Pop panicked and took Bowen out of the game. Ime would have to guard Kobe. The MVP's eyes opened, his ears perked up and he went to work. The way the Kobester treated Blotch was illegal in 22 states, but not, unfortunately, California. It bordered on cruel, really. Udoka quickly picked up a bunch of fouls and to the surprise of absolutely no one, Ginobili fared only a fraction better against Bryant. Nobody on our team outside of Bowen has a prayer against him. I think Pop screwed up big time removing Bowen from the game at that stage, but even taking him out, the substitution would be explainable if he trapped Kobe for the rest of the quarter. Make somebody else beat you. You can't guard him the same way without Bruce that you do with Bruce. You just can't. You think the refs will give Ime Freakin' Udoka a break in Los Angeles against Kobe? That's retarded, Pop.

Things got even worse in the 4th quarter. Duncan started to get doubled and stopped scoring. At times he had open jumpers and refused to take them, passing out to Udoka instead. Our three point shooters - Manu included - were ice cold, going 1 for 9. The paint was closed off for Tony, but he wasn't getting as much room for his jumper either. The whole offense crumpled in a corner and died. The team shot 3 of 21 and committed seven turnovers. Nothing worked. It felt like what being trapped in a small room and realizing that the oxygen is running out must feel like. I was beside myself. I haven't felt like this since the last three innings of Game 6 of the '02 World Series.

The refs were doing us no favors in the fourth, for sure. One critical ball, clearly poked out of bounds by Lamar Odom, was ruled to be off Timmy. Our big three couldn't buy a call on offense. Kobe pushed off on Bruce for the winning jumper and there was no call. At the end, after Manu missed his last three, he looked like he was going to collect the rebound off a deflection, but all of a sudden Odom yanked him down violently and there was no call. A whistle there and it'd have been a loose ball foul, two free throws, and probably a tie game.

But when you're up 20 halfway through the 3rd and lose, you can't blame the refs. You just can't. We blew this game. We blew a really big opportunity, simple as that. These playoffs are a gauntlet the likes of which our guys have never faced before and it's not going to be easy no matter how much we wish it so. We already have five playoff losses. We had four all of last year. Last year was cake.

Where we go from here is the question. The positive - the ONLY positive - is that we know we can play with these guys, even in their building. They're not going to run us out of there like the Hornets did. We respect them too much for that to happen. And this time Pop knew from the beginning to put Bowen on the right guy, so that helps.

I don't know how much of a factor fatigue and having to sleep on the plane was. The team looked dead tired in the fourth. But every game the rest of the way will be played with just one day off, even the ones where the teams have to travel in between. It remains to be seen if the Spurs, collectively, have the legs to pull this off.

As Buck Harvey pointed out, Manu will have one day to sleep in a comfortable bed and spend time in the whirlpool, but I don't know how much he'll be able to relax after his Game 1. I don't think he's ever played a worse game in the NBA. Offensively, shooting, driving, the turnovers, the defense, the intangibles, clutch time, there wasn't a single facet of the game where he wasn't awful. He was 2nd worst on the team with a -19 and truthfully they looked better with him off the floor.

Manu cannot go out like this. He simply cannot. He wasn't even being guarded by Kobe. Instead it was Sasha Vujacic, a shrimpy, goofy-looking Slovenian who has dubbed himself "The Machine." Can you imagine Beno Udrih calling himself "The Machine?" Maybe on the dance floor. Manu has to put this guy in his place and play much, much better the rest of the way. The finger is not an excuse. The ankle is not an excuse. Whatever his injury issues are, they're not causing him to make turnovers, dumb decisions, or playing passive defense. They're not making him take contested shots. Take Vujacic off the dribble, with no help, barrel down the lane and either shoot your floater or draw the damn foul. If you can't move then pass well and make your threes. Be an asset instead of an asshead. You're too good not to be.

To his credit Manu was a stand-up guy in the interview room, as you knew he would be. He blamed himself for playing poorly and not his teammates or his injuries. Still, Pop wasn't helping him any. Again, the play calls are ridiculously predictable. Pop willfully makes the team easy to play against. Every single time Manu gets the ball, it's at the top of the key with a screener coming over. There's never a give and go. There's never a back cut. No isolation play or baseline pick and roll. He's about as inventive with Manu as Mike Brown is with LeBron. I don't know why Pop doesn't trust himself to call plays in half court the way he does in sideline out of bounds situations. He can be a good playcaller when he wants to be, but in open play it's the same sets over and over.

Also, Pop blew it big time not playing Oberto more. Fab is playing well these days and I don't understand why he only got 12 minutes. As long as both Gasol and Odom are in the game, we have no excuse to not stay big. It was working fine. I don't understand the pressing need Pop had to have Michael Finley in the game. At this stage he's a spot player at best. If Udoka is the team's sixth man, then Finley should be like tenth. I'd rather see Barry out there, I'd rather see Kurt Thomas. Finley killed us last night. Also, seriously, never play Jacque Vaughn again. He can't guard anybody, he can't score on anybody, just please spare us already.

Game 2 will be here before we know it. I have no idea how much this team has left in the tank emotionally or physically. We can't afford to go down 2-0 to these guys because coming back from that hole, twice in a row, is too much to ask, even for the Spurs. We have to somehow play better in the second halves of these road games, especially offensively. We have to find a way to score in the paint consistently. We have to get to the line more, we have to make more threes, more easy baskets. 85 points will not be enough.

Again, the goal remains the same. Win all the home games, win one out of four road games. We still have three more chances, theoretically. It was only one loss.

So why does it feel like more than that?

P.S. Tomorrow I'm gonna be on sometime in the 1 o'clock hour pacific time with Mason and J.A. Adande. I've actually heard of him. They're going to be merciless. Game 2 cannot come here fast enough.

Bookmark and Share

"Hurts Like Hell"

That's what Gregg Popovich said, referring to last night's loss to the Lakers, but he might as well have been talking about Manu Ginobili.

Johnny Ludden writes:
[Manu Ginobili] had a long red scratch on his left shoulder, another on his waist, and one of the fingernails from his trusted shooting hand was missing, battle scars all. Each step toward the shower seemed to bring only more pain.

Brent Barry nicknamed Ginobili El Contusión because of nights like this, and that’s what has to concern the Spurs most about Wednesday. They’re strong enough to stomach wasting a 20-point lead in 18 minutes, but they won’t catch these Los Angeles Lakers if Ginobili’s body won’t let them.

Ginobili only would say he had “a couple of issues.” Among those issues: 10 missed shots and four turnovers. But Issue No. 1? Ginobili gave that away an hour before tip-off as he tried to stand on a rubber ball.

“What’s that for?” asked a foreign reporter.

“This is what you do,” Ginobili said, “when you have problems with your ankle.”

Ginobili jammed his left ankle in the opening game of the playoffs against the Phoenix Suns, and he hasn’t been the same since. Compensating for the injury also stressed his groin, but the sore ankle is what has lingered the most. Ginobili still has played brilliantly at times in these playoffs, scoring 29 and 31 points in separate games against the Suns and New Orleans Hornets. But each of those performances was preceded by two days of rest. Given only one day off between games, he’s averaging 14.4 points while shooting worse than 38 percent.
The bad news for Spurs fans is that every game in these Western Conference Finals will be separated by just one day off. Leave it to Manu Ginobili to defy the odds and have a few great games in this series, even if he hurts like hell.

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Spurs in 6

Yesterday I posed the question to SpursDynasty readers, "Spurs or Lakers? How many games?" So far 82 have answered, and more than half say, "Spurs in 6."

TheLakersNation.com posted the same question and got the same answer, only in reverse - Lakers in 6.

No serious fan would believe that either of these teams could sweep this series, and no fans of either team should want to see this series go to seven games, for obvious reasons. Based on the importance of homecourt advantage in the first two rounds, its unlikely that either team will lose twice at home, so that rules out five games.

Which leaves "[My team] in six" as the safe bet. Spurs in 6 is my prediction. David Thorpe, an NBA analyst for ESPN.com, scouts the Spurs-Lakers series and comes to the same conclusion.
The Lakers are probably the best team in basketball: They combine outstanding offensive talents with an excellent system, and feature long, aggressive and smart defenders who are very well coached by Phil Jackson & Co. But the Spurs are also expertly coached, and they play with no fear of losing their crown. Little bothers them, including starting out in a 2-0 series hole. Sometimes we have to look past the records, past the stars, and notice when a team seems to be "destined" for a title. Starting with Duncan's clutch 3-point prayer in Game 1 of Round 1, this team has had that look.

Prediction: San Antonio 4, Los Angeles 2

Bookmark and Share

Lakers Fans Are Saying...

Granted, some of us really don't care what Lakers fans think. I'm a lifelong Spurs fan, first and foremost, but I am also an NBA fan. If the Spurs weren't marching towards their fifth title, I would still be watching these playoffs. I appreciate that some other fans are just as fanatical about their team as I am about mine. So with that in mind, here are what Lakers fans are saying about the series that kicks off tonight.

Matt Moore writes a solid preview of the series at FanHouse. Here is an excerpt, but do yourself a favor and read this one in its entirety.
This is a pretty fantastic matchup between the two best teams in the league right now.

Greg Popovich (sic) has seen the triangle enough to make him throw up at the site of it. He's going to have a very nauseating series. The modified triangle the Lakers have implemented with Kobe, Gasol, and Lamar Odom, with Odom as the lynch pin is absolutely devastating unless your defense is primed for it. Luckily, the Spurs have never met an offense they weren't primed for.
Forum Blue and Gold previews the series by looking at the Spurs and Lakers regular season matches.
This series is going to be an interesting chess match, as both teams have some very powerful offensive weapons and both play impressive defense (although the Lakers tend to be more spotty on that end).

Some will say you can’t take much from the Lakers/Spurs meetings this past season (the Lakers only had Gasol for one of the games, the Spurs were without key players in both losses), but I think when you look back you see some things that will be trends in this series.
(The best thing about this post is the comments thread... it dispels the notion that Lakers fans don't really know basketball. Apparently some do.)

The Kamenetzky brothers give appropriate props to our Spurs on the LA Times Lakers blog:
After a weekend of kicking it and around 48-ish hours to debate their San Antonio Spurs opponents, tonight's Game 1 (6:00 pm PST, TNT) will finally grace roundball enthusiasts with its presence. Their WCF foes are a familiar bunch, a crew that's essentially turned itself into the NBA's version of old (but not too old) faithful. The proverbial "mix" typically has them in it, with a championship never out of the question (and lest we forget, these cats are in fact defending a title). In fact, this decade will likely be regarded as having belonged to one of these squads. In many ways, it's only fitting (if not necessarily ideal) that the purple and gold's championship dreams will require a besting of a team that can arguably be labeled the best.
Incidentally, Andrew Kamenetzky's live-in girlfriend is a Spurs fan originally from McAllen.

Varsityoptimism previews the series at TheLakersNation.com:
The crusty, wily, angry, scowling San Antonio Spurs, full of pride and gusto, exposed the young Hurrrnets and dashed their hopes of an inaugural voyage the Conference Finals and subsequently earned a trip to Los Angeles. A trip they had already packed for. The defending champion’s presumption and revelatory attitude reportedly yielded a night sleeping on the team charter plane rather than a Five Diamond Los Angeles hotel.

So bring on the bird-like face of Manu Ginobili, the blank expression of Tim Duncan, the pockmarked face of Gregg Popovich and the crazy purple arm of Ime Udoka because as my friend B-Will says “You gotta beat the champs to be the champs.” Damn. That should go on a T-Shirt.
Over at LAKERS4LIFE, restrictedfreedom is reliving Derek Fisher's 2004 Game 5 .4 second shot.
Everyone in the arena would have guaranteed that the basketball would end up in Kobe Bryant's hands for the last shot, but that was far from the truth as the Spurs defense was tight as a drum trying to avoid one of the biggest clutch shots in NBA history, as a result, Derek Fisher was able to get just enough room to make a catch and shoot fadaway about a foot or so away from the three point line and all you saw was one of the prettiest swishes in a Lakers fan's memory!

Oh how things have changed since that game 5 in 2004, the Spurs proved that they have become a dynasty by winning to more championships in 2005 and 2007 and the Lakers franchise went straight down the tubes with Shaq and Gary Payton headed to Miami, Karl Malone retiring and the whole Lakers franchise basically going to shit and everyone pointing the finger at Kobe Bryant.
I can't wait to see what Lakers fans are saying to each other after the Spurs steal one tonight at Staples.

Bookmark and Share

Marco Materazzi Is My Homeboy

Here's the Game 7 recap and Game 1 preview, and the link is there for my radio spot on The Steve Mason Show on ESPN Radio 710 AM in LA. It was recorded the day of Game 7. I'll also be on the show this Wednesday and Friday at 2:25 p.m. I believe.

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Spurs Charter Airline To Be Grounded

By now most Spurs fans have heard that "mechanical problems kept the Spurs' plane on the runway in New Orleans for seven hours" last night.

But how many fans realize that the Spurs charter airline, Champion Air, which boasts of "providing a superior travel experience built around safety and reliability" on its website, has a track record which is far from safe and reliable? In fact, Champion Air is going out of business at the end of the month.

Why in the world would Peter Holt have his employees, let alone our defending world champions, flying on such a dubious airline?

Last month the Express-News ran a story on the troubled airline, "Concern rises over Spurs' safety":
The charter carrier has been running its aged jets on a taut financial shoestring while racking up hundreds of safety and maintenance incidents, according to an examination of Federal Aviation Administration records.

Now, the carrier has announced it will ground its 16-plane fleet for good May 31, a casualty of financial duress and inefficient, fuel-guzzling 30-year-old planes that compete poorly against newer planes.

League and airline officials said the Spurs will continue flying the airline through the playoffs, which begin April 19, or until further notice.

If the airline is financially barren and shutting down, how safe are the Spurs going to be in the air?

The airline has had no accidents or crashes in the five years since it began and the Spurs became a customer. But the airline's planes have accrued what one aviation expert considered to be an unusually large number of "service difficulty" reports.

Of 598 such reports to the FAA of mechanical problems, 169 occurred while Champion planes were preparing for flight or already in the air.

Among these were 63 unscheduled landings, such as one in January 2006 when an engine failed in flight. In six other incidents, engines stalled or failed, causing two aborted takeoffs and another unscheduled landing.
Obviously, Spurs fans are not happy about this news.

Bookmark and Share

Poll: Who will win the Western Conference Finals?

Spurs or Lakers? How many games?
Spurs in 4
Spurs in 5
Spurs in 6
Spurs in 7
Lakers in 7
Lakers in 6
Lakers in 5
Lakers in 4
See Results

Bookmark and Share

Spurs Spend Night on Tarmac

In an interview after last night's game seven win in New Orleans, Tony Parker revealed a little secret to Charles Barkley. The team hadn't planned on going back home to San Antonio after the game. They had packed for Los Angeles.

I thought it was an inspired move. But it would seem that New Orleans got the last laugh. Johnny Ludden reports:
When the San Antonio Spurs eliminated the New Orleans Hornets from the playoffs Monday night, they figured the hard part of their journey to the Western Conference finals was over.

Turns out it was only beginning.

In one of the more bizarre travel stories, the Spurs ended up spending the night on the tarmac at New Orleans airport.

The team had planned to fly to Los Angeles after the game, but arrived at the airport to find their flight had mechanical problems. With a cable convention crowding the city’s hotel rooms, the team couldn’t any place to spend the night.

Some of the players slept on the plane while others moved to buses on the tarmac.

The team left New Orleans around 6:30 a.m. And arrived in Los Angeles a few hours later. The Spurs will have only a brief shootaround on Wednesday morning before opening the conference finals against the Los Angeles Lakers that night.

Bookmark and Share

Monday, May 19, 2008

Time to Do That Voodoo That You Do, Spurs Fans

Game 7 tips off in the Big Queasy in just a few hours, and it's time to stop dicking around.

I'll freely admit, in the last couple of years I haven't been the same righteous Spurs fan that I once was, as the complacence of the Spurs' four championships (and perennially competitive teams) and the weight of life's responsibilities have set in. But just for tonight, I'm letting that mad, hyperactive, superstitious Bramlet out of the confines of the gimp's basement I keep him locked in, so he can represent properly and once again take part in influencing the course of Spurs history.

With copious amounts of voodoo undoubtedly being performed upon crude likenesses of the Spurs throughout the city of New Orleans at this moment, and with the enormous odds already stacked against the Spurs in trying to win a Game 7 on the road (and in a place where they've had the shit kicked out of them quite frequently in the recent past), our boys are going to need a little help in the form of some dynamic 'doo. Therefore, I'm providing you so-called fans who, like me, have basically sat on your fat South Texas asses for the last few weeks, with an opportunity to do God's work by helping the good guys win. God might not approve of the method, but when David West's perpetual scowl slowly morphs into the infantile whimper of a loser confronting his fate, it will be clear that the end has justified the means.

I know it's pitiful to pimp my own old post yet again just because I'm a shell of my former Spurs fan self who hardly ever produces new material, but please read this old post for detailed instructions on how to help humiliate the hated Hornets tonight.

Then you can right click on the links below, choose "save target as..." to save photos of the Hornet's players, print them out, and commence Operation: Suck It, Spurs Haters.
Chris Paul
David West
Byron Scott and Bonzi Wells
Peja Stojakovic
Tyson Chandler
Jannero Pargo
Morris Peterson
Julian Wright
Hilton Armstrong

(Of the players more or less in the Hornets' current rotation, I've left out Melvin Ely in weak-ass deference to his brief tenure on God's Team.)

Won't you join me for some good old-fashioned voodoo? I beseech you, Spurs fans, do not go gently into that New Orleans night.

Bookmark and Share

Players and Coaches are Saying

"You've just got to be very focused, knowing that you can't blink, that you can't let the other team get on a run, get confident on a run. It's going to be a really tense game with a lot of adrenaline. Fans are going to be going nuts. So it's going to be a very fun game to play."

"We'll see if we thrive on pressure after Monday's game. We still don't know. It's a great test for both teams. A lot of pressure, as I said before, and we're going to try to be the ones that respond to that pressure the best way."

--Manu Ginobili

"I don't want today to be our last practice. I don't want tomorrow to be our last shootaround. I just felt I needed to let them know and hopefully they feel the same way."
--Byron Scott

"We can forget about what's in the stands. Inside the court, we are going to be 5-on-5. We've got to make the shots. We've got to guard better than them. That's it."
--Manu Ginobili

"If we can't keep it close, experience can't help us."
--Tony Parker

"We need a good beginning, good middle and good end."
--Michael Finley

"As trite as it sounds, it's about playing well for 48 minutes. It's about keeping composure, continuing to be aggressive. At that point, players play well or they don't, or you make shots or you don't, and you live with the outcome."
--Gregg Popovich

"Walking around the city, everybody's talking about how much they want to win and how nervous they are. But I'm not nervous, to tell you the truth. I have the ultimate confidence."
--Chris Paul

"It's intense. One game. One of the teams gets to play (on). Loser goes home. It's going to be very intense, a hostile environment down there in New Orleans, but it's going to be a lot of fun."
--Kurt Thomas

Bookmark and Share

Gonna Be On The Radio Again

This afternoon, 3:02 p.m. Pacific time, I'm supposed to appear again on The Steve Mason Show on ESPN Radio in L.A. I have no idea what I'm supposed to say.

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, May 17, 2008

All We Can Do Is Smile Back

Second Round Game 6 Vs. New Orleans: Spurs 99, Hornets 80 (3-3)

The frustrating, thrilling, maddening thing about sports is how, in an instant, one play changes everything that happened before and everything that will happen next. One unexpected, unpredictable, unscripted moment and suddenly all the storylines and perceptions differ and all your opinions and ideas have to be rethought, reconsidered.

One play, an innocent enough looking offensive foul ordinarily, committed with 10:11 to go in a rout, drastically altered the way everyone thought about the previous 37:49 of Game Six and even more importantly, how they'll view Game Seven. What made this foul noteworthy when it otherwise wouldn't have been was who committed it, whose body part he committed it against, and what the stakes were.

After all, there are literally thousands of hard fouls given during an NBA season.

99% of the time, no one gives a shit.

However, every so often a foul gets people's attention. The broadcasters' voices rise an octave or two. The media's ears perk up. Old storylines are discarded and new ones are hastily written, in time for the morning paper and the 11:00 p.m. SportsCenter. Opinions change. Perceptions change. Futures change. Cheers turn into tears. Heroes become goats and vice versa. One measly foul changes millions of lives ands costs millions of dollars.

If you don't think a single slap on the wrist or nudge on the hip can change the way the whole world looks and thinks about you, ask Manu Ginobili about it.

Better yet, ask Robert Horry.

These are two of the most clutch players in NBA history. Yet both of them will forever be remembered, unfairly, for a single stupid foul they committed. Manu's wasn't flagrant, but it changed the outcome of a series and could've very well cost his team a championship. Horry's foul was flagrant, and while it didn't cost his team a ring, (some would argue that it actually bolstered their chances) it cost him his reputation from an individual standpoint and even more importantly forever altered the way casual fans would view the Spurs franchise.

I admit I was looking ahead to Game Seven. Who wasn't? I didn't really consider the possibility that the Spurs would lose Game Six. They had too much pride, too much history, and contrary to popular opinion, too much talent to go down meekly at home. But for 37 minutes I was visualizing Game Seven one way and then for the final 11 minutes (and the two days afterward) I've thought about it another way, thanks once again, to Robert Horry.

What should've been the prevailing image of Game Six.
(AP Photo/David J. Phillip)

By now everyone knows the story. Horry set a back pick on David West, the oft-grumpy Hornets power forward with the pinched nerve in his lower back, and even though Horry appeared to make contact more with West's posterior than his back, the Xavier man crumpled into the ground in a heap, yelling in agony. Some of the crowd at the AT&T Center - notoriously among the quietest and most fickle fans in the league - chanted Horry's name afterward.

Not our proudest moment as Spurs fans.
(Photo by Garrett W. Ellwood/NBAE via Getty Images)

I think it's important - vitally so - to separate the actions of the man from the reaction of the fans. Cheering any player's injury, even West's, is an unforgivable sin. I know West has been a prick all series. I know he's taken a lot of cheap shots at Fab. Still, that's no excuse. You just don't taunt a man who's hurt. That's bush league stuff. It's another example of why the Spurs themselves are a far better team than most of their fans deserve. Just look at the message boards. After Manu's Game Seven foul on the Mavs' Dirk Nowitzki in '06, many of their so-called "fans" were calling for his head and demanding he be traded, just one year after he was a postseason hero for the Spurs. This year, after the team was slumping in mid-season, many fans were clamoring for a midseason trade for thug Ron Artest of the Kings, the quintessential example of a guy the Spurs organization is not about. Check out the '08 free agency thread and you'll see many posters wishing for the Nuggets' J.R. Smith, another knucklehead. Maybe most damning of all, last year the Spurs didn't sell out Game 2 of the Western Conference Finals, a sign that their supporters had grown complacent with the team's success and that perhaps the Jazz weren't a sexy enough opponent for them to root against.

I'm not trying to bite the hand that feeds me. As a blogger I know more than most that the Spurs have many passionate, quality fans. They just don't have as many as they deserve, as the Game Six audience proved again. This is why it's ultimately fitting that a Game Seven triumph, if it is to be, comes on the road. Thanks to these fans, with a little help from Horry, the Spurs are the bad guys again, the villains. No one wants anything to do with them. The guys deserve to do this alone. They need to do it alone. I hope they do it on the road not just this round but the next two as well. They need to be gladiators.

I've been thinking about the movie "Gladiator" ever since Game Six ended. It's probably my second favorite sports movie, after "Field of Dreams," and no matter what anyone tells you, it was a sports movie. Gladiators were the first real visiting athletes, after all. They walked into the Roman Coliseum with thousands of bloodthirsty strangers cheering for them to die, often as violently and grotesquely as possible. People would wager on their lives and even if these courageous warriors were successful in mortal combat, against tremendous odds, if their fights wasn't thrilling enough for the emperor, he could still have them put to death, without the chance to fight. It wasn't enough to win, they had to win over the crowd as well.

I got your "Woo!" right here.

We know by now that the Spurs will never win over the masses. No Duncan rejection will ever be emphatic enough, no Parker foray to the basket acrobatic enough, no Ginobili pass daring enough. The Spurs will always be despised for what they're not - high-flying, chest-thumping, trash-talking, alley-ooping Americans - rather than praised for what they are: socially unembarrassing, intelligent, cohesive, willful champions. They wouldn't dare shout, mockingly, "Are you not entertained?" to a road crowd, not only because their humility prevents them from doing such a thing but because the Nielsen numbers have proven that even neutral casual fans don't enjoy their performances, no matter how dominant or clinical.

Even more daunting for the Spurs is the history of teams that fall into an 0-2 hole in the playoffs in general and their own history in particular. The franchise has never won in that situation. They've never won when down 3-2. They've never won a road Game Seven. The last time the Spurs were involved in a series where the home team won the first six games was eighteen years ago, The Admiral's rookie campaign in '89-'90, coincidentally enough in the second round, against the Portland Trail Blazers. The games in Portland were all relatively close. The games in San Antonio, in the old HemisFair Arena, were all blowouts. The Spurs had a 97-90 lead with under two minutes to go in Game Seven but Portland came back and won in double overtime, 108-105. They would go on to make the Finals, where they lost in five games to the Detroit Pistons, a team that managed to do what the Spurs thus far haven't - repeat.

It was my first season as a Spurs fan.

So now the Big Three Era Spurs face their biggest challenge to date, a road Game Seven where everyone - EVERYONE - will be pulling against them. Not only will their fans be demanding Horry's dismemberment, but probably Bowen's and Duncan's and Manu's as well. The media, the TV people and the league will be against them because the Spurs don't sell. Right after Game Six, some hack tried to goad Ginobili into commenting on Horry's new reputation as "Cheap Shot Bob," alluding to last year's hip check against the Suns' Steve Nash. Because the Spurs are a team in every sense of the word, Manu quickly came to Robert's defense and offered his rebuttal.

"I think he [Horry] changed more seasons making shots than hitting people," Ginobili said, before adding, "I don't think what he did had anything to do with last year's series. He just pushed Steve [Nash] out of the court, but the problem was their players leaving the [bench]. He made a hard foul last year but [the suspensions] were their fault."

Clutch and a winner, even with the media.
(AP Photo/Matt Slocum)

Sanity at last. Blame Amare Stoudemire and Boris Diaw for reacting the way they did. Blame Commissioner David Stern for strictly enforcing the rules and suspending them. Blame everyone involved in the "Malice at the Palace" in 2005 or that Nuggets/Knicks brawl in the Madison Square Garden last season, if you like, for forcing Stern to take such drastic measures. But don't blame Horry and the Spurs. They just play basketball.

Hopefully not the last time we see The Real Big Three laughing it up this year.
(AP Photo/Matt Slocum)

There's no need to guess which direction Emperor Stern's thumb would point were he able to decide the fate of this series. The potential match-up between MVP Kobe Bryant and the man who probably deserved the honor, Chris Paul, would be compelling theater indeed. One dunks the ball, the other creates dunks for others. The Spurs won't be playing five-on-five or even five-on-eight on Monday, as most fans fear. It'll be five against the basketball watching world, the ultimate challenge for a team full of gladiators.

Just as we know that all men die, we know that one day the Spurs run will end. It could be next season when some team gets the better of them. Or it could be next month at Boston or even two weeks from now at Los Angeles. Eventually, it's going to happen. Our guys will reunite with their long lost wives and loved ones, if not on a celestial field of wheat, then at least on a palatial resort in the Bahamas.

But in the words of Djimon Hounsou's character, Juba, "Not yet."

Not yet.

Bookmark and Share

Friday, May 16, 2008

Did Horry Intentionally Harm West?

Did you see the headline on Yahoo! Sports, "Cheap shot, Bob?" Despite the character defamation implied in the headline, Adrian Wojnarowski has a mostly even-handed take on what happened last night:
Byron Scott... considered the possibility that Robert Horry had turned into Cheap Shot Bob again.

The old man of these San Antonio Spurs had delivered a dubious blow to the bad back of the Hornets’ David West, and the coolest, calmest coach in the NBA was seething through that stoic disposition.

“I’m not real OK with it,” Scott told Yahoo! Sports. “But if I didn’t know Robert on a personal level, I’d say that was a dirty shot. Yeah, if I didn’t know him the way I know him, I’d say it was a cheap shot.”

“I also think he understood what he was doing,” Scott said.

Which was this: He had a chance to hit West, hit him hard and what were the odds that Horry was going to pass on it? Right, right. These are the Spurs, and they’re going to fight you to the ends of earth to take them out of the tournament. They’re the champs and they dictate terms of engagement.

Perhaps Horry’s done making clutch shots in the playoffs, but the seven-time champion forever finds ways to make himself relevant. Here’s his genius: He picked his spot brilliantly. This act didn’t border on a flagrant foul. There will be no fine, no suspension. Yet your eyes dictated a different truth, something that Scott said: Horry knew what he was doing. He knew whom he was hitting and where he was hitting him.

“I’ll take a look at it, but right now, I’ll just say he caught me with a good shot,” West said.

If Horry was trying to knock you out of Monday night, did it work?

“No … no,” West assured. “It wasn’t that good of a shot.”
Fan reaction has been predictably biased. Ron Hitley has excellent, comprehensive coverage of the story at Hornets247.com ("Game 6 Aftermath: Friday News Wrap") that is definitely worth checking out.

Atthehive, who is moderator of the SB Nation Hornets fan site of the same name, called Horry's foul: "Dirty... Bush-league at its finest. And to think the guys over at that Spurs blog were calling OUR players classless? Unbelievable." After having some time to relax and think about it, atthehive still believes the foul was intentional, while asking, "Was it Dirty?"

Spurs fans over at PtR reacted to atthehive's post in a mostly calm and rationale manner, summed up by Windex40's remark:
Any player who knows you have to set a screen on a ginormous man (AKA Mr. West) knows you’re going to have to lean into a bit just to slow down his momentum. You can’t set a screen on West straight up you’ll get trampled and knocked outa the play. So yes, the pick was intentional, the harm was not.
Hornets fans and Spurs haters will believe what they want to believe, but this story is ultimately irrelevant to the outcome of last night's game and, hopefully, game seven.

Here's wishing David West a speedy recovery by Monday night.

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, May 15, 2008

10 Reasons To Believe

For the record, I believe that the Spurs will win tonight. I agree with Michael that the Spurs are "too good to lose to these guys in six." As for a game seven in New Orleans, I'm not so sure... I'd rather that the Spurs not be in this position, but it is what it is.

Here are 10 reasons to believe that the Spurs will win tonight:

#10. The Spurs are undefeated at home in the playoffs, and have won 11 consecutive playoff games at the AT&T Center dating back to last year.
#9. The home team is 19-1 in the Conference Semifinals.
#8. The last time the Hornets beat the Spurs in San Antonio was January 26. The Big Three combined for just 45 points while David West scored 32. Sound familiar? It won't happen again.
#7. Odds makers favor the Spurs by 7.
#6. Tyson Chandler was injured in game five. Chandler bruised his left foot after landing awkwardly in the fourth quarter. Yesterday, "Chandler watched from the sideline at the Arena while his teammates practiced." His playing time should be limited, which means more minutes for Hilton Armstrong and Melvin Ely.
#5. David West's back stiffened in game five, so don't expect him to have another 30+ point performance.
#4. The Spurs shot poorly in game five - just 37.7 percent.


#3. Fans in San Antonio won't be holding up a life-sized poster of Eva Longoria in Hornets blue and gold.
#2. Even Hornets fans think this series will go to seven games.
#1. Joey Crawford won't be working tonight's game.

Bookmark and Share

Formality or Fatality?

Game 5 recap, Game 6 preview...

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

"Appropriate Fear"

We've heard Pop use the phrase "appropriate fear" before. Its about respecting your opponent and appreciating that, on any given day, their strengths and your weaknesses can conspire and lead to your team's defeat.

Appropriate fear is what Tim Duncan and Chris Paul speak about in the latest NBA split screen commercial.



Last night I didn't see an appropriately fearful Spurs team. Maybe it was because they played so well for the last four minutes of the first quarter and most of the second quarter. I watched the game with most of the SpursDynasty crew and a few, I won't name names, were downright giddy when the Spurs went up 43-36 with just 1:49 left in the half on a reverse layup and-one free throw by Manu Ginobili. Not me, though, I was worried.

I recalled the second half of game one in New Orleans, what it felt like in the Hive to be wearing Spurs black in a sea of gold, with the constant chatter of Hornets fans in my ears as my Spurs were outscored 29-17 in an offensive and defensive blitzkrieg. Leading at halftime in New Orleans felt eerily familiar.

In each of the three games played in New Orleans, the Spurs have led at the half. And in each of those games, the Spurs have been run out of the building in the third quarter, outscored 17-29, 18-36 and, last night, 11-28 in what were all losing efforts.

What I saw last night was a Spurs team that was celebrating way too soon, that lacked the appropriate fear any team needs to win a seven-game series. David West was a holy terror, scoring seemingly at will, but that didn't seem to bother the team. I feared that he would continue playing at a career-high level, and he did. I feared that Chris Paul was a sleeping giant, bound to wake up any minute, and he did. But the Spurs were up by three at the half, so why worry, right?

Pop isn't talking fear anymore, he's talking bottom line.
The bottom line is that the better team wins in a seven-game series,” Spurs coach Gregg Popovich said. “I’ve always said that. So whoever wins the series it will be because they’re the better team.”
If the Spurs are to win tomorrow night, demonstrating that they are the better team, it will only be because they've found the appropriate fear and played accordingly in the third quarter.

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

A Perfect Evening, Except For Barkley's Shiny Red Toes

Second Round Game 4 vs. New Orleans: Spurs 100, Hornets 80 (2-2)

Well, that was alarmingly easy. I guess my reverse jinx on Chris Paul worked out, huh?

Actually Paul wasn't too bad, as a scorer. He was 10-16 from the field, after all and had a game high 23 points. The problem was his teammates; his fellow four starters combined for one less bucket than he had by himself. Paul's problem, on the other hand, was that for the first time he had next to no impact on the game as a facilitator, and that was a major surprise. If he isn't the best point guard on the floor, the Nooch have NO CHANCE to win. None.

And let's be clear on this. Sunday night our Tony Parker was decidedly superior to Paul in every facet of the game. He penetrated and finished better, he shot better, he passed better, he defended better, he led better. He looked like a guy who's played in May and June before and Paul looked like a neophyte. For the first time, it appeared as if pressure, as if the moment, got to Paul. His inner computer short-circuited and his decision making went awry. Paul finished with four turnovers to go along with five assists, and really he was fortunate not to be whistled for a couple more offensive fouls or traveling violations. Really I don't understand what the zebras are looking at. He's pretty blatant about using his off arm as a battering ram on drives and on occasion he takes that extra step (or two).

The odd thing about the game is that watching it again, I don't really feel as if either team played as well defensively as the stats or postgame comments would indicate. The Spurs were the superior team, no doubt, but both teams missed a lot of open shots, especially from three point land. As I predicted, Bowen struggled mightily shooting the ball in Game 4 and we were lucky Blotch stepped up. We were only 8-26 (30%) from downtown and that percentage has to improve a bit if we're gonna win one of these road games.

Basically I don't think most of our guys played all that well, and that's what has me excited and concerned at the same time. We won the game on the backs of Parker, Duncan and Udoka. Manu passed it well, but he wasn't really all that great at anything else. Finley shot it well, but he left a lot to be desired defensively, especially against Jannero Pargo. Bruce you know about, and the bigs were so-so, not really rebounding or scoring much. I don't think Oberto did anything special guarding West, the guy just missed a lot of shots, and we threw a few doubles at him that seemed to surprise him.

New Orleans, on the other hand, played terribly. Not one rotation guy played even adequately for them. Paul was below par, the others were miserable. They really couldn't have played any worse at either end. There aren't many NBA teams, if any, that they could've beaten on Sunday. I guess the only bright side would be that if the world champion Spurs are the team they're modeling themselves after, this was a positive step, because they've got the "98 lb. Weakling Game" concept down pat. Fuckin' nailed it.

Like I said, I'm both excited and concerned by the way Game 4 unfolded. Excited because despite the blowout, we have a lot of room for improvement. Believe it or not, we left a lot of points out on the court Sunday. Our ball movement, clearly the best part of our team's performance on Sunday was so dominant that we could've cracked 120 points if we shot it better. Bruce will never be more open in his life and Manu missed a couple that he usually makes as well.

What I'm worried about is that the team will rest on its laurels and get over confident. We have to understand that we put a "A-" or at least a solid "B+" out there on Sunday while the Nooch were a "F-." We've got to play as well as we did on Sunday, if not better, just to be in the game late tonight. The Hornets will come out sharper, more competitive, more energetic, and they'll probably shoot a lot better.

I have a few defensive concerns. For one, the Nooch got a lot of open looks from three, especially when they went small. While I'm not anticipating them going small for large stretches, because it would leave the paint wide open for Tony and Manu, it was glaring, how many shots they got in that alignment. Maybe Scott could take advantage if he leaves Chandler on the floor and takes out West.

Secondly, I fear Pargo, a little. If he plays extended minutes with Paul it would give the Nooch two avenues to run the offense instead of one and they'd become a little less predictable. I think Pargo is a much more dangerous player than Peterson and I'm surprised Scott hasn't started him yet. He might in Game 5.

And last but not least, Bonzi still worries me a little. Sure, Ime did a great job on him, but what if Scott starts him instead of Peterson? Then they post up Manu right away and try to crash the boards. That scenario could work out against us.

As for defensive adjustments, I don't know what else they can do. They're already doing everything they can to make us beat them with Bruce, Fin, Ime and Manu shooting outside. We have guys that can make open shots, so you take what you can get there. And Tim is healthier and more decisive now, so that helps.

The Spurs have done what I'd hoped. They've put New Orleans on their heals and their guys are thinking now instead of acting. Let's see how that affects them at home.

Bookmark and Share

Bowen, Duncan on NBA All-Defensive team

More accolades for our San Antonio Spurs. Let's see if Bowen and Duncan can come through with big defensive efforts tonight in New Orleans. Otherwise, this recognition doesn't amount to much.
“I'm real happy for Timmy and Bruce,” Spurs coach Gregg Popovich said before boarding the Spurs' charter jet to New Orleans. “They worked hard, as all the other players on the list did, I'm sure. But to have two on one team is pretty special.

“That's what helps us win. Without that, we're just another basketball team, but they make it different for us.”

The 30 NBA head coaches select the All-Defensive teams. They gave 24 first-team votes each to Defensive Player of the Year Kevin Garnett of the Boston Celtics and Most Valuable Player Kobe Bryant of the Los Angeles Lakers. Denver's Marcus Camby, the 2006-07 Defensive Player of the Year, got 14 first-team votes and was the first-team center for the second consecutive season.

Bowen got 13 first-team votes and 10 second-team votes and was the only player on either the first or second teams listed as a combo player — a guard/forward.

Duncan got 12 first-team votes and nine second-team votes. He has been on the All-Defensive team each of his 11 seasons in the NBA.

No other team had two players on either the first or second teams.


Spurs guard Manu Ginobili was among the other players receiving votes.

Hornets guard Chris Paul was a second-team selection, and center Tyson Chandler also received votes.

Bookmark and Share

"Spurs have momentum on their side, but little else"

I was ready to do my own research into how teams without homecourt advantage have fared historically after coming back to tie a best-of-seven series 2-2, but John Hollinger beat me to it. ("Spurs have momentum on their side, but little else.")

If stats impress you, you may not want to read any further. Personally, I think this is interesting, but not entirely relevant to what has happened in this series.
What would you say is the likelihood of San Antonio's winning the series? Most of you would probably give an answer somewhere around 50 percent. I suppose a few of you might go as high as 80 or 90 percent. Even a Hornets fan might tell you 30 or 40 percent.

So it might shock you to learn what the historical data says. Depending on what aspect of history you wish to emphasize most, the Spurs' chances come in somewhere between 0 and 17.5 percent.

Huh? How can this be? Let's take a look.

For starters, we can look at the history of teams that won Games 3 and 4 after dropping the first two games in a best-of-seven series. You'd think since they'd won two straight games and turned it into a best-of-3, they'd have had a pretty good shot. You'd also be wrong.

Since the NBA-ABA merger, the "road" team has won the series only 17.5 percent of the time in best-of-7s when the home team won the first four games -- seven out of 40. Five of them came in the past four years, which tricks us into thinking it's more common than it really is: In the two decades prior, it happened only twice.

In conference semifinals, the team with home-court advantage wins 79.2 percent of the time. But in best-of-7s in which the home team wins the first four games, that number improves to 82.5 percent.

continue reading

Bookmark and Share

Monday, May 12, 2008

Duncan, Ginobili Garner MVP Votes

We all know who the real 2008 MVP is, but its of interest to Spurs fans that two of our favorite players received votes this year. Tim Duncan got two fourth place votes and 19 fifth place votes while Manu Ginobili received nine fifth place votes.

I know of at least one columnist who voted for Manu and here's why:
Ginobili's particularly unique impact this season defied any conceivable statistical measure until our friends at 82games.com unveiled "Clutch Stats" (fourth quarter or OT, five minutes or less, five-point margin or less) and "Super-Clutch Stats" (fourth quarter or OT, two minutes or less, three-point margin or less). In "Clutch" situations, the Argentinian (I love calling him that) averaged nearly a point a minute and shot 57 percent from the field, 44 percent from 3 and 93 percent from the foul line. In "Super-Clutch" situations, Manu was the third-best scorer (behind LeBron and Kobe) and shot a jaw-dropping 62 percent from the field. Throw in free-throw attempts and you could make a case that Manu was a lock to score seven out of 10 times in the last two minutes of every close game. There might be better players, but nobody's better with the bread in the toaster. Not even Kobe.
To put things into perspective, only 17 players received any votes this year, and Manu received more votes than Dirk Nowitzki, more votes than Deron Williams, and more votes than Carmelo Anthony, Paul Pierce, Rasheed Wallace, Carlos Boozer and Antawn Jamison combined. Impressive.

Wait a second, someone voted for Antawn Jamison?!

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, May 11, 2008

"Paul & Company will go down scrapping"

Those aren't my words, but the words of Peter Finney, New Orleans sports columnist, writing in last Monday's Times-Picayune.
The Hornets will lose this best-of-seven-game series to the defending NBA champions, despite winning the opener by 19 points.
Personally, I'm not so sure, but I do believe the Spurs will win tonight. The Spurs are favored by six again. And so far in these Conference Semifinals, the home team has won 13 of 14 games.

I expect tonight's to be another close game, or a blowout favoring the Spurs. It depends on how Byron Scott adjusts -- "speed the tempo, play better defense and get more contributions from the bench" -- to the changes that Pop made in game three, and whether the Big Three can come through again.

Regardless of the outcome, whoever loses tonight will go down scrapping.

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, May 10, 2008

Pop Changes Strategy, Peja Cries Softly Into Pillow

Game 3 recap! A full day before Game 4! I get to shower now! Yippee!

Bookmark and Share

Friday, May 09, 2008

How To Beat the Hornets

Has Pop figured out how his team of veterans can beat the younger, more energetic New Orleans Hornets? If so, let's hope that what happened last night can be replicated three more times, and that Byron Scott and his team are unable to adjust.

1. Matthew Powell at PtR gives credit to Bruce Bown for shutting down Peja Stojakovic. After averaging 23.5 points in the first two games, Peja was held to eight by Bruce last night. (Speaking of Peja, I attended game one in New Orleans and Peja's face on a stick was handed to fans as they entered the Hive. I kept it and brought it to last night's viewing, so my fellow SpursDynasty writers could properly deface Peja's image before and during the game. I thought I might post it here for our readers to enjoy, but this is a family site. Ok, that's not true. I'll post it later.)

2. Johnny Ludden points out the Bowen-Stojakovic matchup and another adjustment that made a big difference in game three.
The Spurs can’t live without Parker. He helped carry them through the first round against Phoenix and if they have any hope of making this a competitive series, he’ll have to do some more heavy lifting. On Thursday, that meant also guarding Paul.

Such duties often don’t make for much fun. Bowen chased Paul for much of the series’ first two games and Paul simply picked apart the Spurs with his passing, making Peja Stojakovic one of his favorite targets. Realizing as much, Popovich opened Thursday with Bowen on Stojakovic. Having frequently tormented Stojakovic in Sacramento, Bowen again kept him in check.

Popovich also made one other important adjustment: He turned the NBA’s Sixth Man of the Year into a starter.
I would add two more items to the list of things the Spurs need to do to win three out of their next four games.

3. The Big Three need to combine for 65 or more points. That was the magic number during the regular season. Last night Parker and Ginobili had 62! We need more big games from our Big Three.

4. Keep turnovers to a minimum. The Spurs gave it up 13 and 15 times in games one and two, compared to seven and eight times for the Hornets. Turnovers were a draw last night - both teams had 10.

For more in-depth analysis, read what Charley Rosen writes for FOX Sports. And while you're at it, check out the poll question, "Will the Spurs come back and win the series?"

Bookmark and Share